Two Brothers Distributing Incorporated et al v. Valero Marketing and Supply Company
| Two Brothers Distributing Incorporated, Two Brothers II Incorporated, Two Brothers III Incorporated, Two Brothers IV Incorporated, Two Brothers VI Incorporated, Two Brothers VII Incorporated, Two Brothers IX Incorporated, Two Brothers XVI Incorporated, One Brother 1 Incorporated and Springwells & I-75 Incorporated |
| Valero Marketing and Supply Company |
| 2:2015cv01509 |
| August 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| David G Campbell |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 174 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 8/23/2019.(DGC, nvo)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER granting 113 and 114 Valero's Motions for Summary Judgment; Denying as moot all other pending motions. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and terminate this case. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/19/17.(DXD)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 17 . Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint on or before 12/18/2015. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/25/2015.(DGC, nvo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
