Wilson v. Yavapai County Sheriff's Office et al
| Dale Wilson |
| Mary Hamm, Sheila Polk, Randy Evers, Anna Mary Glaab, Yavapai, County of, Sam Dubois, Yavapai County Attorneys Office, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office and Paul Julian |
| 3:2011cv08199 |
| December 12, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Prescott Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER that Plaintiff's 33 Motion for Reconsideration is denied. That the Yavapai County Defendants' 32 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defense Reply is denied. Defendants' 23 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is granted in the amount of $9,820.00. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/31/12.(DMT)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting 7 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk shall enter judgment for the Defendants. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 3 and 20 Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunction; denying 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend R esponse to Motion to Dismiss; granting 13 Defendants' Motion to Strike Motion to Amend Response to Motion to Dismiss and granting 17 Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of the Court shall strike (Doc. 11) and (Doc. 16) from the Docket. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/28/12.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
