Martinez et al v. United States of America
Armando Nieves Martinez, Amelia Pesqueira Ortega and Armando Nieves Pesqueira |
United States of America |
4:2013cv00955 |
August 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Tucson Division Office |
XX Outside US |
Leslie A Bowman |
Personal Injury: Assault Libel & Slander |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 200 *ORDERED: In accordance with these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant. The Clerk of Court shall close its file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/30/2019. (ARC) *Modified file date from 10/1/19 to 9/30/19; NEF regenerated on 10/1/2019 (SCH). |
Filing 165 ORDER the Notice of Lodging Proposed Form of Rule 54(b) Judgment (Doc. 161 ) is DENIED. A Status Conference is set for Tuesday, September 18 at 10:00 a.m. before the Hon. Cindy K. Jorgenson, Courtroom 5C of the Evo A. DeConcini United States Courthouse, 405 W. Congress Street, Tucson, Arizona 85701. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/10/2018. (KEP) |
Filing 156 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 150 . The Government's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 127) is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs' claims of negligence, gross negligence, assault, and false imprisonment. The Government's Mot ion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 127) is DENIED as to the Plaintiffs' claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Proposed Pretrial Order due within 30 days of the date of this Order. Status Conference set for 8/15/2018 at 10:30 AM before Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson. Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 7/9/18. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH) |
Filing 150 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, enter an order DENYING the 127 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the defendant on 5/17/17. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being ser ved with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, the party's right to de novo review may be waived. Local Rules permit the filing of a response to an objection. They do not permit the filing of a reply to a response without the permission of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 10/11/17. (BAC) |
Filing 24 ORDER denying 21 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 11/5/14. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH) |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 . Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Motion for More Definite Statement is GRANTED IN PART (Doc. 11 ). Plaintiffs' causes of action for defamation, misrepresentation, malicious prosecution, wrongful interference with business relations, negligent infliction of emotional distress and negligent misrepresentation are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as to the remaining causes of action. Plaintiffs' may file a first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order in compliance with the terms of this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 7/22/14. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.