Shupe et al v. Cricket Communications Incorporated

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Shupe et al v. Cricket Communications Incorporated

Shupe et al v. Cricket Communications Incorporated

Plaintiff:	Richard Shupe
Defendant:	Cricket Communications Incorporated
Case Number:	4:2013cv01052
Filed:	August 29, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Tucson Division Office
County:	Pima
Presiding Judge:	Cindy K Jorgenson
Presiding Judge:	Bernardo P Velasco
Nature of Suit:	Other Fraud
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 10, 2014	Filing 42 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Ordered Magistrate Judge Markovich's 39 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Markovich to address any post-judgment motions. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 12/10/2014.(BAR)
January 14, 2014	Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered the 22 Report and Recommendation is adopted. It is further Ordered the 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction / Motion to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration is denied as moot, Th e Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 5 and 12 ) are denied, the Motion to Amend or Correct the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 ) is denied, and the Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 13 ) is granted with leave to amend. It is further Ordered Plaintif f shall have 30 days from the date of filing this Order to file a Third Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a judgment of dismissal, without prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file a Third Amended Complaint within 30 days of the filing date of this Order (see attached PDF for more information). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/13/2014. (MFR)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 10, 2014

Filing 42 ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Ordered Magistrate Judge Markovich's 39 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment. The case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Markovich to address any post-judgment motions. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 12/10/2014.(BAR)

January 14, 2014

Filing 23 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is Ordered the 22 Report and Recommendation is adopted. It is further Ordered the 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction / Motion to Dismiss & Compel Arbitration is denied as moot, Th e Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 5 and 12 ) are denied, the Motion to Amend or Correct the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 ) is denied, and the Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Doc. 13 ) is granted with leave to amend. It is further Ordered Plaintif f shall have 30 days from the date of filing this Order to file a Third Amended Complaint. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter a judgment of dismissal, without prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff, if Plaintiff fails to file a Third Amended Complaint within 30 days of the filing date of this Order (see attached PDF for more information). Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/13/2014. (MFR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shupe et al v. Cricket Communications Incorporated
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Cricket Communications Incorporated
Represented By:	Andrew Martin Jacobs
Represented By:	Katherine Vail Foss
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Shupe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?