Schottenbauer #114478 v. Ryan et al
| Michael Gerard Schottenbauer |
| Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 4:2015cv00017 |
| January 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Tucson Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Leslie A Bowman |
| David C Bury |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 16 in its entirety. The 21 Objections raised by the Petitioner are OVERRULED. The 20 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Final Judgment to enter separately by the Clerk's Office. A Certificate of Appealability is likewise DENIED. This action is closed. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 10/28/2015. (KEP)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court, enter an order DISMISSING the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is time-barred. Any party may serve and file written objections within 14 days of being serve d with a copy of this report and recommendation. If objections are not timely filed, they may be deemed waived. The Local Rules permit a response to an objection. They do not permit a reply to a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 7/29/15.(BAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
