Horace Edwards Kelly v. Arthur Calderon
Petitioner: Horace Edwards Kelly
Respondent: Arthur Calderon
Case Number: 2:1998cv02722
Filed: June 4, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Terry J. Hatter
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 54 PROTECTIVE ORDER AND SEALING ORDER by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr. See document for details. (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Horace Edwards Kelly v. Arthur Calderon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Horace Edwards Kelly
Represented By: Margo A Rocconi
Represented By: Manuel U Araujo
Represented By: Sean J Bolser
Represented By: David W Fermino
Represented By: Harry Simon
Represented By: Maria E Stratton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arthur Calderon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?