United States of America v. 12026 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California
| 2:2005cv05354 |
| July 25, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patrick J. Walsh |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
AMENDED JUDGMENT FORFEITING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The prior Judgment is hereby entered in this matter in favor of the United States of America in the amount of 784,323.75. The Subject Prop erty is forfeited and condemned to the United States to the extent of $784,323.75. The clerk is hereby directed to enter this judgment, which constitutes a final judgment resolving this action. The government shall recover its costs as previously taxed by the clerk (docket number 118 in related case CV 05-5353) 55 (pj)
|
|
Filing
55
JUDGMENT FORFEITING AN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO THE UNITED STATES OF America by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Namis LLC may satisfy the judgment entered herein by delivering 1,045,765.00. (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. 12026 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
