Evans v. Crane

Evans v. Crane

Case Number:	2:2006cv00030
Filed:	January 3, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 20, 2008	Filing 131 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION by Judge Audrey B. Collins: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff Robb Evans, as Receiver over the assets of James P. Lewis, Jr., individually and doing business as Financial Advisory Consultants, Income Fund, Ltd. and Growth Fund, Ltd., is awarded a joint and several judgment against Defendants Philip Shupe, Sally Shupe and Podiatry Institutes of America in the amount of $130,000.00, together with post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of judgment until paid in full at the rate provided by such statute. (bm)
October 24, 2008	Filing 127 JUDGMENT by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Plaintiff Robb Evans as Receiver of the assets of James P. Lewis, Jr., individually and doing business as Financial Advisory Consultants, Income Fund, Ltd. and Growth Fund, Ltd., shall have judgment against defend ant Tomijo Stoewsand (Stoewsand) in the principal amount of $62,519.00, together with pre-judgment interest on said sum at the federal statutory rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 in effect on the date of filing this lawsuit and through October 21 , 2008, in the amount of $7,624.12 for a total judgment in the amount of $70,143.12 pursuant to the First, Second and Third Claims for Relief asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint, together with an award of post-judgment interest accruing from a nd after the date of entry of judgment until paid in full pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961;judgment entered against Stoewsand herein and any other judgments entered heretofore or hereafter in this action against any other defendants are several as t o each such defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be joint and several as to the particular defendants; there is no just reason for delay in entry of this final judgment against Stoewsand, and the Court expressly directs the entry of this separate judgment against Stoewsand pursuant to F.R. Civ. P. 54 notwithstanding whether this action remains pending against other defendants; and Clerk of the Court shall enter this judgment forthwith while this action remains pending against other defendants. (ir)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 20, 2008

Filing 131 JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION by Judge Audrey B. Collins: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff Robb Evans, as Receiver over the assets of James P. Lewis, Jr., individually and doing business as Financial Advisory Consultants, Income Fund, Ltd. and Growth Fund, Ltd., is awarded a joint and several judgment against Defendants Philip Shupe, Sally Shupe and Podiatry Institutes of America in the amount of $130,000.00, together with post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of entry of judgment until paid in full at the rate provided by such statute. (bm)

October 24, 2008

Filing 127 JUDGMENT by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Plaintiff Robb Evans as Receiver of the assets of James P. Lewis, Jr., individually and doing business as Financial Advisory Consultants, Income Fund, Ltd. and Growth Fund, Ltd., shall have judgment against defend ant Tomijo Stoewsand (Stoewsand) in the principal amount of $62,519.00, together with pre-judgment interest on said sum at the federal statutory rate under 28 U.S.C. § 1961 in effect on the date of filing this lawsuit and through October 21 , 2008, in the amount of $7,624.12 for a total judgment in the amount of $70,143.12 pursuant to the First, Second and Third Claims for Relief asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint, together with an award of post-judgment interest accruing from a nd after the date of entry of judgment until paid in full pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961;judgment entered against Stoewsand herein and any other judgments entered heretofore or hereafter in this action against any other defendants are several as t o each such defendant unless otherwise expressly stated in the judgment to be joint and several as to the particular defendants; there is no just reason for delay in entry of this final judgment against Stoewsand, and the Court expressly directs the entry of this separate judgment against Stoewsand pursuant to F.R. Civ. P. 54 notwithstanding whether this action remains pending against other defendants; and Clerk of the Court shall enter this judgment forthwith while this action remains pending against other defendants. (ir)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. Crane
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?