Seamans v. State of California Department of Social Services
| 2:2006cv01232 |
| February 28, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
169
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Kim Belshe against Patrick W Seamans. Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 167 : For the reasons sets forth in the Court's Order Granting Summary Judgment fo r Defendant Kim Belshe, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Patrick Seamans take nothing, that the action be dismissed because Plaintiff failed to allege a sound legal basis for his claims, and that each party bear its own costs of the action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
167
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order Granting Summary Judgment for Defendant; Summary Judgment 155 , 156 is GRANTED for Defendant. Defendant shall submit a judgment within ten (10) days of the date of this order IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Seamans v. State of California Department of Social Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
