Securities and Exchange Commission v. El-Batrawi
| 2:2006cv02247 |
| April 13, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
167
AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT ADNAN M. KHASHOGGI 160 by Judge Christina A. Snyder pursuant to Stipulation 165 . See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
164
FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT RAMY Y. EL-BATRAWI by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Consent 154 , without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint, waived findings of fact and conclusions of law, and waived any right to appeal from thi s Final Judgment, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Ramy Y. El-Batrawi and his agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, etc. See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commission v. El-Batrawi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
