Cam Guard Systems Inc v. Smart Systems Technologies Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Cam Guard Systems Inc v. Smart Systems Technologies Inc

Cam Guard Systems Inc v. Smart Systems Technologies Inc

Case Number:	2:2006cv06949
Filed:	October 31, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 12, 2008	Filing 122 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Cam Guard Systems Inc against Smart Systems Technologies Inc Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 94 , Jury Trial - Completed, 107 : The issues having been duly tried and the jury having rendered its verdict, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 1. That U.S. Patent Nos. 7,059,783; 7,111,997; and 7,267,496, each owned by Cam Guard, are valid and enforceable. 2. That SST's surveillance towe rs with the recorder in the secure base enclosure, SST's modified surveillance tower with the recorder in an enclosure on the pole, and SST's modified surveillance tower with the recorder in a supervisor's trailer/unit infringe Claims 1-7, 9-14, 16-17 and 19-26 of the '783 patent. 3. That SST's surveillance towers with the recorder in the secure base enclosure infringe Claims 1-5, 8, 13 and 14 of the '997 patent. 4. That SST's modified surveillance tower with t he recorder in an enclosure on the pole, and SST's modified surveillance tower with the recorder in a supervisor's trailer/unit infringe Claims 1 and 3-5 of the '496 patent. 5. That Cam Guard shall recover from SST damages in the amoun t of $183,000; 6. That Cam Guard shall recover its costs, prejudgment and postjudgment interest and Cam Guard is to submit a brief on the amount of interest to be added to the damages award no later than October 20, 2008; and 7. That SST, togeth er with its officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and any person in active concert or participation with them having actual notice of this Order are hereby permanently enjoined from making, using, offering to sell, rent, or lease, or s elling, renting, or leasing within the United States, its territories and possessions, or by importing into the United States, its territories and possessions, its current surveillance towers or surveillance towers that meet all of the limitations of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,267,496, U.S. Patent No. 7,059,783, and U.S. Patent No. 7,111,997 during the unexpired terms of those patents, without authorization or license from Cam Guard. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court expressly directs the Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 12, 2008

Filing 122 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of Cam Guard Systems Inc against Smart Systems Technologies Inc Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 94 , Jury Trial - Completed, 107 : The issues having been duly tried and the jury having rendered its verdict, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 1. That U.S. Patent Nos. 7,059,783; 7,111,997; and 7,267,496, each owned by Cam Guard, are valid and enforceable. 2. That SST's surveillance towe rs with the recorder in the secure base enclosure, SST's modified surveillance tower with the recorder in an enclosure on the pole, and SST's modified surveillance tower with the recorder in a supervisor's trailer/unit infringe Claims 1-7, 9-14, 16-17 and 19-26 of the '783 patent. 3. That SST's surveillance towers with the recorder in the secure base enclosure infringe Claims 1-5, 8, 13 and 14 of the '997 patent. 4. That SST's modified surveillance tower with t he recorder in an enclosure on the pole, and SST's modified surveillance tower with the recorder in a supervisor's trailer/unit infringe Claims 1 and 3-5 of the '496 patent. 5. That Cam Guard shall recover from SST damages in the amoun t of $183,000; 6. That Cam Guard shall recover its costs, prejudgment and postjudgment interest and Cam Guard is to submit a brief on the amount of interest to be added to the damages award no later than October 20, 2008; and 7. That SST, togeth er with its officers, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and any person in active concert or participation with them having actual notice of this Order are hereby permanently enjoined from making, using, offering to sell, rent, or lease, or s elling, renting, or leasing within the United States, its territories and possessions, or by importing into the United States, its territories and possessions, its current surveillance towers or surveillance towers that meet all of the limitations of one or more claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,267,496, U.S. Patent No. 7,059,783, and U.S. Patent No. 7,111,997 during the unexpired terms of those patents, without authorization or license from Cam Guard. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court expressly directs the Clerk to enter this Final Judgment as set forth above. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cam Guard Systems Inc v. Smart Systems Technologies Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?