Eric Clarke v. First Transit, Inc. et al
Eric Clarke |
First Group America, Inc., First Transit, Inc., First Transit Transportation LLC, First Transit, First Transit Transportation, First Group America Company and DOES |
2:2007cv06476 |
October 4, 2007 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Gary A. Feess |
Margaret A. Nagle |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 ORDER ON Stipulation to Dismiss Entire Action Without Prejudice 138 by Judge Gary A. Feess. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed between the Plaintiff and Defendants, that the Class Action shall be dismissed without prejudice both as t o Plaintiff as an individual as well as to the class as a whole. Plaintiff and Defendants shall bear their own fees and costs in connection with the Class Action with the exception of such fees and costs as the Court may award Defendants in relation to Defendants' Motion for an Order Imposing Sanctions for Initiative Legal Groups Violations of the Courts May 6, 2011 Protective Order and Breaches of Ethical Obligations. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp) |
Filing 83 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Margaret A. Nagle re Stipulation for Protective Order 82 (ec) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.