Wyatt Technology Corporation v. Malvern Instruments Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Wyatt Technology Corporation
Defendant: Malvern Instruments Incorporated, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and David Dolak
Case Number: 2:2007cv08298
Filed: December 21, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Santa Barbara
Presiding Judge: Margaret A. Nagle
Presiding Judge: Dean D. Pregerson
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 326 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Audrey B. Collins: For the reasons set forth in the Courts July 29, 2009 Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants Motions For Partial Summary Judgment On Copyright And Noncopyright Claims, the Courts September 23, 2009 Order Granting Defendants Motion For Partial Summary Judgment On Plaintiffs Copyright Claims 1-3, and the parties February 3, 2010 Joint Status Report and Stipulation Re: Entry of Judgment, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Wyatt on all of the claims in the Second Amended Complaint. The Court retains jurisdiction to resolve Defendants Request for Sanctions for Plaintiff's Violation of the Courts November 14, 2008 and September 10, 2009 Orders and any motion for attorneys fees and/or application to the clerk to tax costs that may be filed.THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO ENTER THIS JUDGMENT FORTHWITH. (ir) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/5/2010: # 1 Main Document) (ab).
July 29, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright and Non-Copyright Claims 84 , 92 , 109 , 110 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motions. The Court denies Plaintiffs Rule 56(f) request. The Court grants in significant part the Copyright Motion, and grants in part and denies in part the Non-Copyright Motion. Where the Court denies Defendants Motions, it does so without prejudice. (See Order for Details). (sch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wyatt Technology Corporation v. Malvern Instruments Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wyatt Technology Corporation
Represented By: Frank Frisenda, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Malvern Instruments Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Dolak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?