William Boles v. Merscorp, Inc. et al
| William Boles |
| Merscorp, Inc., American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., National City Bank and Unknown Owners of the Evidence of The Debt and/or Owners of the Note |
| 2:2008cv01989 |
| March 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Riverside |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Real Property: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, that counsel for Plaintiff Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/9/2009, why this action should not be dismissed against Defendants American Home Mortgage Investment Corporation and American Broker s Donduit for lack of prosection. The Court will consider the filing of -Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint- on or before the above date, as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause. Oral argument will not be heard in this matter, unless so ordered by the Court. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause may result in dismissal. (da)
|
|
Filing
129
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 85 held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Before this Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. The Court heard oral argument on this matter on March 2, 2009. After considering the moving and opposing papers and oral argument, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing
75
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Proceedings: Order Re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order 68 . The Court concludes that Boles has failed to show that he is entitled to a TRO. Therefore, Boles' Application is DENIED. (mg)
|
|
Filing
71
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order Denying Application for Temporary Restraining Orde 59 , 68 . Boles is urged to serve the affected party. Boles is also reminded that he must notify the Court of the efforts made to contact theaffected parties; and whether, after such contact, the affected parties have indicated opposition to the TRO application or have requested to be present when heard. See Local. R. 7-19.1 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
|
|
Filing
36
IN CHAMBERS MINUTES OF Judge Philip S. Gutierrez re: Defendant's motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6), The Court finds the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The Court: 1)GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff& #039;s first cause of action to quiet title, with leave to amend; 2) GRANTS Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second cause of action for recission of the second loan for the violation of TILA, with leave to amend; 3) GRANTS Defendan t's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's second cause of action for damages for the violation of TILA, with leave to amend; and 4) DENIES Defendant's motion to dismiss Plainitff's third cause of action for breach of contract. Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within twenty-one days from the date of entry of this order. (da)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
