L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Fabritex, Inc. et al
||L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
||Fabritex, Inc., Unger Fabrik, LLC, J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. and DOES
||September 22, 2008
||California Central District Court
||Western Division - Los Angeles Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||17:101 Copyright Infringement
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 24, 2009
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman: To expedite the flow of discovery material, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality, protect adequately material entitled to be kept co nfidential, and ensure that protection is afforded only to material so entitled, it is, pursuant to the Court's authority under Rule 26(c) of the FRCP and with the consent of the parties, ORDERED: Non-disclosure of Stamped Confidential Documents. (See document for further details.) (pcl)
|November 16, 2009
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Upon review of the parties Stipulation for Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 17 , and for good cause appearing, this action is to be dismissed without prejudice with this dismissal subject to the provisions of the settlement agreement which has been entered into by the parties and which precipitates this dismissal; Upon completion of the payment and other terms set forth in the settlement agreement referenced herein above, Plaintiff is to file a revised with prejudice dismissal of this action; Each party is to bear its own costs and fees as incurred against one another. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.