ExxonMobil Oil Corporation v. Gasprom Inc. et al
| ExxonMobil Oil Corporation |
| DOES and Gasprom Inc. |
| Attorney Settlement Officer |
| DOES and ExxonMobil Oil Corporation |
| Gasprom Inc. |
| 2:2008cv07259 |
| March 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
NUNC PRO TUNC JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of ExxonMobil Oil Corporation against Gasprom Inc.: It is now Ordered and Adjudged as follows: ExxonMobil shall recover from Gasprom compensatory damages in the sum of $3,700; Gasprom is permanently enjoined from doing any or all of thefollowing: (see document for further details). Gasprom's counterclaim shall be dismissed in its entirety on the merits with prejudice. ExxonMobil is entitled to recover its costs of suit from Gasprom in the amount of $8,963.25. ExxonMobil is entitled to recover from Gasprom its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses from Gasprom in the sum of $297,991.50. Nunc pro tunc to 03/26/10. (bm)
|
|
Filing
115
JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, in favor of ExxonMobil Oil Corporation against Gasprom Inc.: It is now Ordered and Adjudged as follows: ExxonMobil shall recover from Gasprom compensatory damages in the sum of $3,700; Gasprom is permanentl y enjoined from doing any or all of the following: (see document for further details). Gasprom's counterclaim shall be dismissed in its entirety on the merits with prejudice; ExxonMobil is entitled to recover its costs of suit from Gasprom; ExxonMobil is entitled to recover from Gasprom its reasonable attorneys fees and expenses from Gasprom. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
17
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez re Order Denying Plaintiff's EX PARTE APPLICATION for a TRO 7 : For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Application for a TRO is DENIED. However, the Court grants Plaintiffs request to schedule a hearing for a preliminary injunction on the matter. The Court sets a hearing date for a preliminary injunction on December 15, 2008 at 1:30pm. The Court will treat Plaintiffs ex parte application for a TRO as Plaintiffs moving papers for a preliminary injunction. Opposition papers should be filed no later than December 2, 2008. Plaintiff may file a reply brief by December 8, 2008. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
