Kim Laube & Company, Inc. et al v. Wahl Clipper Corporation et al
Kim Laube & Company, Inc. and Kim Laube |
Wahl Clipper Corporation, Gregory S. Wahl and DOES |
2:2009cv00914 |
February 6, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Ventura |
Chooljian |
Wright |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 507 FINAL JUDGMENT FOR ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt. That this Court has found that certain of Plaintiffs' claims for misappropriation of trade secrets against Wahl were brought in bad faith within the meaning of Cal.Civl Code 3426.4, in that they were: (1) objectively specious, and (ii) brought and/or maintained in subjective bad faith. That final Judgment is entered in favor of Wahl and against Plaintiffs findings that certain of Plaintiffs' claims for misappropriation of trade secrets were brought in bad faith, and that Wahl is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees to Wahl and against Plaintiffs, KLC and Laube, joint and several, pursuant to Cal. Civil Code 3426.4. That the Court awards $58,046.74 in costs and expenses to Wahl and against Plaintiffs, KLC and Laube, joint and several, pursuant to Cal.Civil Code 3426.4. (bp) |
Filing 468 FINAL JUDGMENT 467 by Judge John A. Kronstadt: That final judgment is entered in favor of Defendants, Wahl Clipper Corporation ("Wahl") and Does 1 to 10, and against Plaintiffs, Kim Laube & Company ("KLC") and Kim Laube ("Laube"), on all of Plaintiffs' claims. That final judgment is entered in favor of Counter-Plaintiff Wahl and against Counter-Defendant Laube. (See document for further details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir) |
Filing 151 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 145 . [CHANGES MADE BY COURT IN BOLD]. (See Order for Details) (rp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.