Lawrence Shih et al v. City of Corona et al
| Yen San Chuang, Lawrence Shih, Chi-Yu King, Bi-Shia King, Hsing-Chieh Shih, Bi-Yu Shih, Bih-Lien Chuang, Dianne Shih, Tai-Nan Wang, Hsiu-Mei Wang, Sherman Shyh Huang Lee and Min Ling Lee |
| The City Council of The City of Corona, DOES and City of Corona |
| 2:2009cv06001 |
| August 17, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Riverside |
| Parada |
| Wright |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
JUDGMENT: 1. That the administrative writ of mandate applied for herein is denied; 2. That the second cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal protection, third cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal protecti on, race and ethnicity, fourth cause of action for violation of Cal Govt Code Section § 65008, fifth cause of action for declaratory relief, and sixth cause of action for injunctive relief, alleged in the first amended complaint, shall be dismissed, without prejudice, as to all defendants;3. That each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees. by Judge Otis D Wright, II, Related to: Stipulation for Judgment, 52 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
45
STATEMENT OF DECISION FOLLOWING COURT TRIAL by Judge Otis D Wright, II:Based on the entire record, Petitioners have not met their burden of showing thatthe Citys denial of their application was arbitrary, capricious or entirely lacking in evidentiary support. Petitioners have also failed to demonstrate that the Citys alleged violation of Government Code section 65860 entitles them to the requested relief. For the foregoing reasons (among others), therefore, the instant petition is DENIED. (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
