Edward Khalil Kakish v. Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2009cv08056
Filed: November 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Lew
Presiding Judge: Chapman
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 27 . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay the amount of $3300.00, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. (bem)
January 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi, Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 25 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED and this matter REMANDED, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bem)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edward Khalil Kakish v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?