Einstein Cosmetics, LLC et al v. CVS Caremark Corp. et al
| Einstein Cosmetics, LLC and Joseph L. Shalant |
| Does, CVS pharmacy and CVS Caremark Corp. |
| Joseph L. Shalant and Einstein Cosmetics, LLC |
| CVS Pharmacy, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv00640 |
| January 28, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
REVISED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Einstein Cosmetics, LLC take nothing by its Complaint, that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed and that Defendants recover their costs. (See attached Revis ed Final Judgment for further information). IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the answer to CVS counterclaims be stricken, and that default judgment be entered only as to the counterclaim for breach of contract against Einstein Cosmetics, LLC, includin g damages in the amount of $1,025,040.60 against Einstein Cosmetics, LLC with CVS to recover its costs as prevailing party, in accordance with FRCP 54. No further claims remain in this action and this judgment constitutes a final judgment. (jp)
|
|
Filing
75
JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Einstein Cosmetics, LLC take nothing by its Complaint, that Plaintiff Complaint be dismissed and that Defendants recover their costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
