Maximum Availability Limited v. Vision Solutions, Inc. et al
Case Number: 2:2010cv01488
Filed: March 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 434 FINAL JUDGMENT AND CONSENTINJUNCTION by Judge George H. Wu, Plaintiff Maximum Availability Limited take nothing on its first claimfor relief for false advertising in violation of the Lanham Act and its fourth claimfor relief for trade libel; and that judgment be entered in favor of Defendants onthose claims; By consent of the parties, the Order Re Preliminary Injunction entered by the Court on May 20, 2010 [Dkt. # 72] remains in effect during the period afterthis judgment is entered, and until the time for appeal has expired, or, if an appealis taken, until jurisdiction is returned to the District Court, with no admission ofliability by the Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 132 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky, re: Stipulation for Protective Order, 121 . (mz)
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 111 ORDER DENYING PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. (See document for details). (ib)
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 14 Motion to Transfer Case (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 3/2/2010.]
February 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER regarding briefing schedule on pending motions re 30 Stipulation filed by William Hammond, Vision Solutions, Inc., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 30 Stipulation, 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 18 Ex Parte Application for a Te mporary Restraining Order and an Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction; 14 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).Amended opposition due by 2/9/2010. Replies due by 2/9/2010. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/5/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010) [Transferred from California Northern on 3/2/2010.]
December 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT re 8 Stipulation filed by William Hammond, Vision Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/31/09. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2009)[Transferred from California Northern on 3/2/2010.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maximum Availability Limited v. Vision Solutions, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?