Creative Integrated Systems, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. et al
Creative Integrated Systems, Inc. |
Macronix America, Inc., Does, Macronix International Co, Ltd., Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America, Inc. |
2:2010cv02735 |
April 14, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Victor B. Kenton |
A. Howard Matz |
Patent |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 330 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz. Joint Stipulation of Non-Infringement and Proposed Covenant not to Sue with Respect to the '461 patent 329 is APPROVED, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. (1) Final Judgment with prejudice is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff. By agreement of the Parties, this Final Judgment, as it relates to the '461 patent, shall not be appealable. (2) Final Judgment with prejudice is hereby entered in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff. By agreement of the Parties, this Final Judgment, as it relates to the 461 patent, shall not be appealable. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) |
Filing 189 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton, This is a patent infringement action. Discovery and trial of this case will involve the exchange of highly sensitive information. Such information may include confidential business strategies, fi nancial data, product design and manufacturing details, blueprints, customer lists, confidential research, development, or commercial information, and other information that is not available to the public. The parties agree that the disclosure of suc h highly sensitive information to the public may be detrimental to their respective commercial interests. Therefore, in agreement with the principles laid out in Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co, 331 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003), the parties have agreed to this protective order. re Notice of Lodging 183 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS/NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT) (lmh) |
Filing 162 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court will address the merits of Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 90 . The Court hereby takes that Motion OFF-CALENDAR and UNDER SUBMISSION. (jp) |
Filing 133 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff Motion to Amend 85 . No hearing is necessary. FRCP 78; L.R. 7-15. (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.