Forever 21, Inc. v. Top Top Clothing, Inc. et al
| Forever 21, Inc. |
| Primetime Clothing, Inc., Top Top Clothing, Inc. and Does |
| Salt & Pepper, Sole Mio, One Clothing, Timing, Inc. and Track Jeans/Blue Jade Enterprises, Inc. |
| Forever 21, Inc. |
| Top Top Clothing, Inc. |
| Top Top Clothing, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv06311 |
| August 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H. King |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge George H. King. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: Defendant Top Top Clothing, Inc., also doing business as Yossi Fashion, Top Top Jeans and Everything $ ;1 $2 $3, and all of its agent, employees, officers, representatives and all other persons and/or entities acting in concert or participation with Top Top Clothing, Inc. or at Top Top Clothing, Inc.'s direction, including, but not limi ted to (a) all persons associated with any wholesale or retail outlet in any form (brick and mortar, internet, etc.) in which Top Top and/or its President, Yosef Dangor, have any ownership interest; (b) all persons associated with any wholesale or re tail outlet which is under the management or control of Top Top and/or its President, Yosef Dangor; and (c) all such wholesale and retail outlets, and each of them (hereinafter, individually and collectively, "Top Top"), are permanently enj oined from ever doing, attempting, or causing to be done, whether directly or indirectly, by any means, method, or device whatsoever, any of the following: The import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, use, acquisition, purchase, o ffer, sale, transfer, brockerage, consignment, distribution, storage, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, marketing, advertising or promotion of any Forever 21 product, including, but not limited to, any Forever 21 clothing, unless such action is first authorized in writing by an officer, director or managing agent of Forever 21, Inc. Related to: Stipulation for Settlement, 73 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
|
Filing
29
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge George H. King: Pursuant to our September 30, 2010 Order, the Court hereby GRANTS Forever 21's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and ORDERS that Top Top Clothing, Inc., its officers, directors, agents, owners, ser vants, employees, representatives, attorneys, successor companies, related companies, and other persons or entities in active concert or participation with them, including Yossi Fashion, Top Top Jeans, and Everything $1 $2 $3, and Prim eTime Clothing, Inc., its officers, directors, agents, owners, servants, employees, representatives, attorneys, successor companies, related companies, and other persons or entities in active concert or participation with them, including Yossi Fashio n, Top Top Jeans, and Everything $1 $2 $3, are hereby enjoined pending resolution of this matter from: (see document for further details). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a bond or undertaking in the amount of $10,000 be posted with th e Clerk of the Court to provide security for the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any party who is found to have been wrongfully restrained or enjoined. This injunction shall take effect upon the posting of such bond. (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
