Oband, Inc. v. The 8020 Corporation et al
| Oband, Inc. |
| B. Sargent, The 8020 Corporation, Brendan Bakir and Does |
| 2:2010cv06959 |
| September 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT THE 8020 CORPORATION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: This matter having come before the Court on the Stipulation for Entry of Final Judgment executed by Plaintiff OBAND, Inc.'s ("OBAND") and Defendant The 8020 Corporation ("8020"), the Court being fully advised, it is HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) A Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of OBAND, Inc. and against 8020 on all counts; (2) Within seven (7) days of receiving a copy of this Order , Network Solutions, Inc. or any other registrar shall change the name of the registrant for the domain name <oband.com> to the name of OBAND, Inc., a California corporation; (3) Beginning on June 10, 2011, 8020 and its respective agents, repre sentatives, servants, employees, attorneys, officers, directors, shareholders, licensees, affiliates, joint venturers, parents, subsidiaries, related corporations and all others in privity or acting in concert with them are permanently enjoined from: (see document for further details). (4) Per agreement between OBAND, Inc. and 8020, no monetary damages are awarded in favor of OBAND, Inc. as a result of this Final Judgment; and (5) The Court shall and hereby does retain jurisdiction over this matter and the Parties identified herein to enforce the terms of this Final Judgment. (bm)
|
|
Filing
14
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER - Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Serve Defendant Sargent by Electronic Mail by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) Pending before the Court is OBand, Inc.'s Motion fo r Leave to Serve Defendant B. Sargent by Electronic Mail. The Court considers the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15...Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Serve Defendant Sargent by Electronic Mail under Rule 4(f) is DENIED. re: 12 Motion for Leave (lw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
