Gaylord Smith v. James D. Hartley
Petitioner: Gaylord Smith
Respondent: James D. Hartley
Case Number: 2:2010cv07130
Filed: September 23, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Marc L. Goldman
Presiding Judge: Stephen V. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition 13 is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
September 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER TRANSFERRING Case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/23/10. (Hellings, J) [Transferred from California Eastern on 9/24/2010.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gaylord Smith v. James D. Hartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James D. Hartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gaylord Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?