Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al Featured Case

The Southern California Institute of Law, a part-time, evening-only law school, filed an antitrust suit against TCS Education System over its contractual affiliation with the Santa Barbara and Ventura Colleges of Law in California.

Plaintiff: Southern California Institute of Law
Defendant: David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd. and TCS Education System
Case Number: 2:2010cv08026
Filed: October 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Andrew J. Wistrich
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER Granting Stipulation to Dismiss 81 by Judge John A Kronstadt. It is Ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and cost. The Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of enforcing the parties' Settlement Agreement and Release, dated as of November 10, 2011. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
November 23, 2011 Filing 81 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to settlement filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Re Dismissal of Action)(Shohet, George)
November 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 80 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John A Kronstadt: On November 18, 2011, defendant filed Status Report 79 indicating that the matter has settled. The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for December 19, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. The Status Conference re Settlement set for November 28, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. is vacated. (rne)
November 18, 2011 Filing 79 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant TCS Education System. (Sarris, Nicholas)
October 31, 2011 Filing 78 AMENDED ANSWER Defendant TCS' Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint to Amended Complaint, 73 filed by Defendant TCS Education System. (Sarris, Nicholas)
October 31, 2011 Filing 77 AMENDED ANSWER Defendants David J. Figuli's and Global Equities, LLC'S Answer to Second Amended Complaint filed by defendant Global Equities, Ltd.. (Jaffe, Cody)
October 19, 2011 Filing 74 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Second Amended Complaint, 73 : The document was processed under the incorrect filed date of 10/19/11. The filed date has been corrected and the time/date stamp now reflects the correct filed date of 10/17/11. A copy of the corrected document is attached. (Attachments: # 1 Second Amended Complaint) (rne)
October 17, 2011 Filing 76 PROOF OF SERVICE of Second Amended Complaint 73 sent by first class mail filed by Plaintidff Southern California Institute of Law. (lom)
October 17, 2011 Filing 75 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law, re Second Amended Complaint, 73 served on attorneys for defendants TCS Education System, David J. Figuli and Global Equities, LLC dba Higher Education Group. (rne)
October 17, 2011 Filing 73 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd., TCS Education System amending First Amended Complaint 41 filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (rne) Modified on 10/19/2011 to correct filed date (rne).
October 17, 2011 Filing 72 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law of Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages; Proof of Service. (Nelson, Gretchen)
October 3, 2011 Filing 71 MINUTES OF Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 48 . Defendant TCS Education Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 49 Hearing held before Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court grants the motion to dismiss without leave to amend as to the second cause of action for negligent misrepresentation against TCS. The Court denies the motion to dismiss the third cause of action for misappropriation of trade secrets as to Defendant TCS, but grants the motion to dismiss the third cause of action as to Defendants Figuli and HEG, with leave to amend, so the Plaintiff can determine whether the agency claims regarding the Defendants can, in good faith, be pleaded in the alternative. (See attached Minute Order for further information). The Court denies the motion to dismiss the fifth cause of action for a violation of the unfair competition law. Plaintiff shall file its second amended complaint no later than 10/17/2011. The Court sets a Status Conference re Settlement for 11/28/2011 at 1:30 PM. Counsel shall file a joint report regarding their respective views on a settlement procedure by 11/21/2011. The Court will determine whether the 11/28/2011 hearing is necessary upon review of the report. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (jp)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John A Kronstadt: re: ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS DAVID J. FIGULI AND GLOBAL EQUITIES LLCS MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OFPLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT TCS EDUCATION SYSTEMS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 48 49 . The Court, on its own motion, continues the above referenced motions from September 19, 2011 toOctober 3, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. (shb)
September 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order 67 . See document for details. (yb)
August 23, 2011 Filing 68 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Stipulation for Protective Order 67 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Stipulation was submitted before the wrong judge. Stipulation should have been set before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich not District Judge John A. Kronstadt. No action required at this time.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (mz)
August 22, 2011 Filing 67 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shohet, George)
August 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John A Kronstadt RE: DEFENDANTS DAVID J. FIGULI AND GLOBAL EQUITIES LLCS MOTION 48 TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT TCS EDUCATION SYSTEMS MOTION 49 TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Court, on its own motion, continues the above referenced motions, currently on calendar for 8/8/2011, to 9/19/2011 at 1:30 p.m. (vdr)
July 27, 2011 Filing 65 DECLARATION of George A. Shohet in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 49 , MOTION to Dismiss 3,4,5 COA MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd. 48 filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Shohet, George)
July 25, 2011 Filing 64 REPLY In Support Of MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 49 filed by Defendant TCS Education System. (Sarris, Nicholas)
July 25, 2011 Filing 63 REPLY Support MOTION to Dismiss 3,4,5 COA MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd. 48 filed by Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd.. (Jaffe, Cody)
July 20, 2011 Filing 62 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Motion 61 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 11-6 Memorandum brief exceeds 25 pages. THE DOCUMENT IS ACCEPTED AS FILED. COUNSEL ARE TO TAKE NOTICE OF THE CM/ECF PROCEDURES. ANY FUTURE DOCUMENT WILL BE STRICKEN FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES. (shb)
July 19, 2011 Filing 61 MEMORANDUM in Opposition Defendants' Motions To Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Shohet, George)
July 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 59 by Judge John A Kronstadt. The Court orders that the plaintiff may file a single opposition memorandum which does not exceed 35 pages in length. (vdr)
July 14, 2011 Filing 59 STIPULATION to Exceed Page Limitation as to Memorandum in Opposition to Motions to Dismiss filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Shohet, George)
July 6, 2011 Filing 58 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Proposed Order Granting re MOTION to Dismiss 3,4,5 COA MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd. 48 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Fitzgerald, Maurice)
July 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER by Clerk of Court The document is stricken. Counsel is ordered to lodge the proposed order by July 8, 2011. In the future, proposed orders shall be filed as an attachment to the motion to which it references. Counsel are to take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. RE: MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) 53 (shb)
July 6, 2011 Filing 55 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) 53 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): This is not a motion but a proposed order that references a motion that was filed on June 27, 2011.. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (shb)
July 5, 2011 Filing 53 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER G-112B]- NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd.. Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge John A Kronstadt. (Fitzgerald, Maurice) Modified on 7/6/2011 (shb).
July 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER ON JURY/COURT TRIAL; Final Pretrial Conference/Motions in Limine: March 12, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.; Status Conference re Exhibits March 23, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.; Jury Trial:March 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. by Judge John A Kronstadt. (Refer to attached document for other requirements.) (lom)
June 30, 2011 Filing 57 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge John A Kronstadt. The Court and counsel confer regarding the status of the case and discovery. The Court sets the following deadlines: Discovery Cut-Off: (end of November); Expert Discovery Cut-Off: January 16, 2012; Last day to hear motions: February 20, 2012; Final Pretrial Conference: March 12, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.; Status Conference re Exhibits: March 23, 2012 at 3:00 p.m.; and Jury Trial: March 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.Counsel shall confer and file a stipulation and proposed order regarding interim dates, e.g., percipient and expert discovery cut-off dates. Counsel for all parties shall comply with this Courts standing orders with respect to documents to be prepared and filed in connection with the Final Pretrial Conference. The parties do not believe a settlement conference would be productive at this time. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (lom)
June 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS REQUEST 51 TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A Kronstadt. Defendants' counsel, Maurice J. Fitzgerald, is granted leave to appear telephonically at the 6/30/2011 scheduling conference. (vdr)
June 29, 2011 Filing 51 REQUEST for Order for Permission to Appear at Scheduling Conf. Telephonically filed by Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd.. Request set for hearing on 6/30/2011 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A Kronstadt. (Hayes, Aaron)
June 27, 2011 Filing 50 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 49 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sarris, Nicholas)
June 27, 2011 Filing 49 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant TCS Education System. Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge John A Kronstadt. (Sarris, Nicholas)
June 27, 2011 Filing 48 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss 3,4,5 COA, MOTION to Dismiss Defendant David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd. ( Motion set for hearing on 8/8/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge John A Kronstadt.) filed by Special Appearance by Co-Defendant David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd.. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum)(Sarris, Nicholas)
June 23, 2011 Filing 47 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 8 days, filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law.. (Shohet, George)
June 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING THE STIPULATION 43 EXTENDING THE TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge John A Kronstadt. Defendants are granted to 6/27/2011 to file their responsive pleadings to the First Amended Complaint. (vdr)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A Kronstadt:. This case has been assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt. A Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 6/23/2011. This matter has been set for a Scheduling Conference on 6/30/2011. This Order applies to all parties in this action, whether or not they are represented by counsel. Counsel as used in this Order, also refers to parties who are representing themselves. If plaintiff has not already served the complaint (or any amendment thereto) on each defendant, plaintiff shall promptly do so and shall file proofs of service within three days thereafter. Defendant(s) also shall timely serve and file their responsive pleadings and file proofs of service within three days thereafter. (See order for further details). (shb)
June 6, 2011 Filing 44 NOTICE OF LODGING filed 6/6/11 re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply 43 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Stipulation)(Sarris, Nicholas)
June 6, 2011 Filing 43 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant TCS Education System.(Sarris, Nicholas)
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A Kronstadt. PLEASE READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT GOVERNS THIS CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John A. Kronstadt. (See Order for Details). (rp)
May 23, 2011 Filing 42 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law, re Amended Complaint 41 served on 5/23/2011. (rne)
May 23, 2011 Filing 41 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd., TCS Education System amending Complaint - (Discovery) 1 ,filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law (shb)
May 23, 2011 Filing 38 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) 37 . No.pdf image of the document was attached to the docket entry. Also, a Notice of Electronic Filing was not generated. A copy of the document is attached to this notice for reference. (Attachments: # 1 Order Striking First Amended Complaint) (rne)
May 20, 2011 Filing 39 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice (Other) 36 , Amended Document (Non-Motion) 34 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): A First Amended Complaint is an initiating document. All initiating documents are to be manually filed. See G.O. 10-07(V)(C).. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (rne)
May 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER by Judge John A Kronstadt STRIKING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT / Amended Document (Non-Motion) 34 . Counsel is ordered to re-file pursuant to G.O. 10-07 no later than 5/23/2011. (rne) (rne).
May 18, 2011 Filing 36 NOTICE filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. Notice of Errata to First Amended Complaint (Shohet, George)
May 18, 2011 Filing 35 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law, re Amended Document (Non-Motion) 34 First Amended Complaint served on May 18, 2011. (Shohet, George)
May 18, 2011 Filing 34 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN] - AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. First Amended Complaint (Shohet, George) [Document STRICKEN by order of the Court 37 . Modified on 5/23/2011 (rne).] Modified on 5/23/2011 (shb).
April 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER OF THE CHIEF JUDGE (#11-013) approved by Chief Judge Audrey B. Collins. Pursuant to the recommended procedure adopted by the Court for the Creation of calendar of Judge John A. Kronstadt, this case is transferred from Judge Philip S. Gutierrez to the calendar of Judge John A Kronstadt for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV10-8026 JAK(AJWx). (sn)
April 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to file its First Amended complaint 31 . The Court grants Plaintiff an extension of time to file its First Amended complaint to, and including 5/17/11. (ir)
April 22, 2011 Filing 31 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Order on Motion to Dismiss Case,,,,,, 23 filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Shohet, George)
April 19, 2011 Filing 30 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS Discharging the Order to Show Cause by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: On 4/4/2011, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal Pursuant to FRCP 4(m). On 4/17/2011 and 4/18/2011, Defendant electronically filed a response to the Order to Show Cause. The Court deems the response satisfactory. Accordingly, the Order to Show Cause is hereby discharged. (jp)
April 18, 2011 Filing 29 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Lawto Motion Hearing, Link Motions to Minutes,, 24 Plaintiff's response to OSC re Dismissal (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Declaration, # 4 Affidavit)(Shohet, George)
April 17, 2011 Filing 28 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Lawto Motion Hearing, Link Motions to Minutes,, 24 Plaintiff's Response to OSC re Dismissal (Shohet, George)
April 13, 2011 Filing 26 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Request to Substitute Attorney, Proposed Order 25 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Judge's initials not indicated in caption of attached Request and [Proposed] Order. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm)
April 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Request to Substitute Attorney Jeffrey S Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP in place and stead of Attorney Christopher Thomas Casamassima 25 GRANTED. (ir)
April 11, 2011 Filing 25 REQUEST to Substitute attorney Jeffrey S. Whittington in place of attorney Christopher Casamassima filed by Defendant TCS Education System. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Casamassima, Christopher)
April 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant TCS Education System's Motion to Dismiss by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) Pending before the Court is TCS Education Systems Motion to Dismiss Southern California Institute of Law Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Court held a hearing on the matter on April 4, 2011. After considering the moving and opposing papers, as well as the arguments presented at the hearing, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part TCS Education Systems Motion to Dismiss....the Court DENIES TCS's Motion to Dismiss SC Law's breach of contract claim (claim one) and GRANTS TCS's Motion to Dismiss SC Law's breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (claim two), breach of fiduciary duty and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (claim three), negligent misrepresentation (claim four), misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of California Civil Code § 3426, et seq. (claim five), attempted monopolization in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (claim six), monopolization in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (claim seven), conspiracy to monopolize in violation of § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (claim eight), violation of Californias Cartwright Act (claim nine), and violation of Californias Unfair Competition Law (claim ten) WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SC Law must file an amended complaint by APRIL 26, 2011 or the Court will dismiss those claims WITH PREJUDICE...granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion to Dismiss Case (lw)
April 4, 2011 Filing 24 MINUTES: Defendant TCS Education Systems's Motion to Dismiss 14 : The case is called and counsel are present. The Court and counsel confer regarding above-referenced motion. Having heard from counsel, the Court takes the matter under submission. Parties are ordered to show cause regarding dismissal pursuant Rule 4(m). Response to Order to Show Cause shall be filed by no later than April 18, 2011 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Court Reporter: Miriam Baird. (ir)
March 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re DEFENDANT TCS EDUCATION SYSTEM'S MOTION TO DISMISS E-FILED 12-23-10 (DOC. 14) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: PLEASE BE ADVISED that on the Courts own motion, the above-referenced matter is hereby continued from March 21, 2011 to April 4, 2011 at 1:30 pm. (bm)
March 7, 2011 Filing 21 REPLY In Support of MOTION to Dismiss Case 14 filed by Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd., TCS Education System. (Casamassima, Christopher)
March 1, 2011 Filing 20 DECLARATION of George A. Shohet in opposition to MOTION to Dismiss Case 14 filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Shohet, George)
February 11, 2011 Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition To Defendant TCS Education System's Motion To Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Shohet, George)
February 8, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File its Memorandum of Points and Authorities in opposition 17 . Having reviewed the parties' Stipulation and Declaration of plaintiff's counsel filedin support thereof, and for good cause shown, the Court grants plaintiff anextension of time to file its Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Oppositionto TCS's Motion to Dismiss to, and including, February 10, 2011. The hearing onthe Motion to Dismiss 14 is continued to March 21, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 850 of the above-captioned Court. (ir)
February 5, 2011 Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File, STIPULATION for Hearing re Motion to Dismiss filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Shohet, George)
December 28, 2010 Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Motion 13 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Document appears to be a duplicate of 14 . If separate Notice was meant to be filed, incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is Responses/Replies and Other Motion Related Documents-Notice of Motion. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm)
December 23, 2010 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Dismiss Case 14 filed by Defendant TCS Education System. (Casamassima, Christopher)
December 23, 2010 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant TCS Education System. Motion set for hearing on 2/28/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting TCS Education System's Motion to Dismiss)(Casamassima, Christopher)
December 23, 2010 Filing 13 NOTICE filed by Defendant TCS Education System. Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting TCS Education System's Motion to Dismiss)(Casamassima, Christopher)
December 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS 11 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Notice of motion to dismiss 9 , Memorandum of P/A in support 10 , for the following reasons: Other: Hearing date is closed. Please see under Note. (bm)
December 20, 2010 Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss Case, Memorandum in Support 9 , 10 . The following error(s) was found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s) are specified below. Other error(s) with document(s): Motion is noticed for a date that is closed on the court's calendar. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (bm)
December 17, 2010 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Dismiss Case 9 filed by Defendant TCS Education System. (Casamassima, Christopher) ***DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 12/21/10, DOCUMENT 12 .*** Modified on 12/22/2010 (bm).
December 17, 2010 Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant TCS Education System. Motion set for hearing on 1/31/2010 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting TCS Education System's Motion to Dismiss)(Casamassima, Christopher) ***DOCUMENT IS STRICKEN PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER DATED 12/21/10, DOCUMENT 12 .*** Modified on 12/22/2010 (bm).
December 17, 2010 Filing 8 CERTIFICATION & NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant TCS Education System, identifying TCS Education System, David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd. d/b/a Higher Education Group. (Casamassima, Christopher)
December 17, 2010 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant TCS Education System (Casamassima, Christopher)
November 23, 2010 Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law, upon Defendant TCS Education System served on 10/29/2010, answer due 12/17/2010. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon David Weber, Agent for Service of Process for TCS Education System in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Shohet, George)
November 19, 2010 Filing 5 FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to TCS Education System answer now due 12/17/2010, filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law.(Shohet, George)
October 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, (bp)
October 25, 2010 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed.(car)
October 25, 2010 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law (car) (ds).
October 25, 2010 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd., TCS Education System. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Andrew J Wistrich.(Filing fee $ 350 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law.(car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/26/2010: # 1 Notice of Assignment, # 2 Summons, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet) (ds).
October 25, 2010 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants David J. Figuli, Global Equities, Ltd., TCS Education System. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David J. Figuli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Global Equities, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TCS Education System
Represented By: Christopher Thomas Casamassima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Southern California Institute of Law
Represented By: Jacob H Mensch
Represented By: Gretchen M Nelson
Represented By: George A Shohet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?