Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Dunbar et al
| Monster Cable Products, Inc. |
| Jonathan Dunbar and Does |
| 2:2010cv10014 |
| December 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M. Gee |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION filed by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Final judgment including permanent injunction shall be and hereby is entered on the complaint. Defendant and any person or entity acting in concert with, or at the direction of him , including any and all agents, servants, employees, partners, assignees, distributors, suppliers, resellers and any others over which he may exercise control, are hereby restrained and enjoined. This Final Judgment shall be deemed to have been serve d upon Defendant at the time of its execution by the Court. NO APPEALS AND CONTINUING JURISDICTION. No appeals shall be taken from this Final Judgment, Including Permanent Injunction,and the parties waive all rights to appeal. This Court expressly re tains jurisdiction over this matter to enforce any violation of the terms of this Final Judgment, including Permanent Injunction, and the Permanent Injunction herein. NO FEES AND COSTS. Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs incurred in this matter. (See document for further details) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
