Securities and Exchange Commison v. Michael W Perry et al
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant: Michael W Perry and A. Scott Keys
Case Number: 2:2011cv01309
Filed: February 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: George H. King
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 151 FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL W. PERRY by Judge Manuel L. Real. IT IS HEREBY ORDERD, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation w ith them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") [15 U.S.C. 77q(a)(3) in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation of communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly, to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchase. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
September 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 148 UNCONTROVERTED FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Manuel L. Real. Regarding Defendant Michael W. Perry's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Risk Weighting and Section 17(a)(2) Claims. (jp)
May 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT A. SCOTT KEYS by Judge Manuel L. Real, in favor of A. Scott Keys. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Clerk shall enter Final Judgment of Dismissal in favor of A. SCOTT KEYS as to all claimsasserted by Plaintiff U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission in this matter. 74 (pj)
May 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 64 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real re Stipulation for Order 62 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall be bound by the terms of the StipulationRegarding Confidentiality. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (jre)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Commison v. Michael W Perry et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: Nicholas S Chung
Represented By: Donald W Searles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael W Perry
Represented By: David B Bayless
Represented By: John C Keith
Represented By: Louis E Kempinsky
Represented By: Benjamin J Razi
Represented By: D Jean Veta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Scott Keys
Represented By: Jessica L Matelis
Represented By: Gregory S Bruch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?