Jake Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Jake Mandeville-Anthony
Defendant: Disney Enterprises, Inc., Does, Pixar, The Walt Disney Company and Walt Disney Pictures
Case Number: 2:2011cv02137
Filed: March 14, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 53 filed by Jake Mandeville-Anthony, CCA # 11-56441. The answering brief submitted on 3/8/12 is filed. [See document for further information]. Order received in this district on 3/13/12. (car)
January 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals 53 filed by Jake Mandeville-Anthony, CCA # 11-56441. The court has received the appellant's opposed motion for reconsideration of the portion of the 12/9/11 order that denied the appellant's renewed motion to augment the record on appeal. The appellant's original motion to augment the record, and all related filings, are referred to the merits panel for disposition pursuant to the court's 11/3/11 order. [See document for further information] Order received in this district on 1/11/12. (car)
December 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER ON Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis 28 USC 1915 54 by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. The Court has considered the motion and the motion is DENIED. (jp)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 63 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: denying 49 Motion for Attorney Fees. (se)
September 27, 2011 Filing 64 BILL OF COSTS. Costs Taxed in amount of $ 15.84 in favor of The Walt Disney Company, et al. and against Jake Mandeville-Anthony. RE: 52 (mb)
September 12, 2011 Filing 62 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: None; Re: Notice of Appeal to the 9th CCA 53 . (dmap)
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson DENIED Request for Approval of Substitution of Jack Mandeville-Anthony as Pro Se in place and stead of Nicholas A. Kurtz, Dunlap, Grubb & Weaver PLLC 59 . **Counsel will need to file a Motion to be relieved** (jp)
September 1, 2011 Filing 60 REPLY in support of MOTION for Attorney Fees Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support 49 filed by Defendants Disney Enterprises, Inc., Pixar, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Pictures. (Singer, David)
September 1, 2011 Filing 59 APPLICATION to Substitute attorney Jake Mandeville-Anthony in place of attorney Nicholas A. Kurtz filed by Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony. Application set for hearing on 10/3/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kurtz, Nicholas)
August 29, 2011 Filing 58 Objection in opposition to re: APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony 52 filed by Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony. (Kurtz, Nicholas)
August 29, 2011 Filing 57 Opposition in opposition to re: MOTION for Attorney Fees Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support 49 filed by Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony. (Kurtz, Nicholas)
August 24, 2011 Filing 56 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 11-56441, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 53 as to Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony. (lr)
August 23, 2011 Filing 55 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, 53 served on 8/16/2011. (lr)
August 22, 2011 Filing 52 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against Plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony filed by defendants Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, The Walt Disney Company, Disney Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Bill of Costs)(Singer, David)
August 22, 2011 Filing 51 BILL OF COSTS Deficiency Notice Filed. The following deficiency was noted on the APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony 50 : (1) Hearing should be noticed before the clerk's designee and not the judge. Counsel is to re-notice the corrected hearing information. (2) Counsel is to prepare the Bill of Costs from and the Notice of Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs as two separate documents. (jp)
August 22, 2011 Filing 50 APPLICATION to the Clerk to Tax Costs against plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony filed by defendants Pixar, Walt Disney Pictures, The Walt Disney Company, Disney Enterprises, Inc.. Application set for hearing on 9/8/2011 at 01:00 PM before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. (Singer, David)
August 22, 2011 Filing 49 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Attorney Fees Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support filed by Defendants Disney Enterprises, Inc., Pixar, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Pictures. Motion set for hearing on 9/19/2011 at 01:30 PM before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David R. Singer, # 2 Proposed Order)(Singer, David)
August 19, 2011 Filing 54 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis filed by plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony. (dmap) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/23/2011: # 1 Lodged Proposed Order) (dmap).
August 19, 2011 Filing 53 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Jake Mandeville-Anthony. Appeal of Judgment 48 . Filed On: 08/08/2011; Entered On: 08/09/2011; FORMA PAUPEIS PENDING. cc: Jake Mandeville-Anthony. (dmap)
August 8, 2011 Filing 48 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, in favor of Disney Enterprises, Inc., Pixar, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Pictures against Jake Mandeville-Anthony. (kbr)
August 1, 2011 Filing 47 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Order on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 44 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Judgment)(Singer, David)
July 28, 2011 Filing 46 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing). (Attachments: # 1 Minute Order Dismissing Case) (jp)
July 28, 2011 Filing 45 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: COURT ORDER RE DEFENDANTS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings 29 . Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for 8/1/2011 at 1:30 PM. (See attached Minute Order for further information). Accordingly, the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. This case is DISMISSED and the matter CLOSED. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
July 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank GRANTING Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings 29 , pursuant to FRCP 12(c), judgment on the pleadings is entered infavor of Defendants, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety withprejudice. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff. (jp)
May 12, 2011 Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by defendants Disney Enterprises, Inc., Pixar, The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Pictures.(Singer, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jake Mandeville-Anthony v. The Walt Disney Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Disney Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Sanford M Litvack
Represented By: David R Singer
Represented By: Alexander A Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pixar
Represented By: Sanford M Litvack
Represented By: David R Singer
Represented By: Alexander A Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Walt Disney Company
Represented By: Sanford M Litvack
Represented By: David R Singer
Represented By: Alexander A Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walt Disney Pictures
Represented By: Sanford M Litvack
Represented By: David R Singer
Represented By: Alexander A Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jake Mandeville-Anthony
Represented By: Nicholas Allen Kurtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?