MNA Partners Limited et al v. Irfan Amanat
| Kamal El Tayara and MNA Partners Limited |
| Irfan Amanat |
| 2:2011cv02327 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER RE-OPENING CASE AND ALLOWING LIMITED DISCOVERY by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiffs may propound a single interrogatory regarding the provenance of the subpoenas at issue in this case. Plaintiffs shall serve the interrogatory within seven days of the date of this order. Defendant shall respond within seven days of receipt. (Case reopened. MD JS-5.) (lc)
|
|
Filing
22
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson in favor of MNA Partners Limited and Kamal El Tayara against Irfan Amanat related to Order on Motion for Default Judgment Hearing 20 . IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 1. Defendant Irfan Amanat shall pay Plaintiffs the sum of Seven Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($7,500,000) (total, not per Plaintiff) for actual and punitive damages arising from Defendant's fraudulent embezzlement of funds. 2. Defendant shall indemnify Plaintiffs in the event Plaintiffs are required to defend, compromise, or make payments in response to any and all claims by any and all third-party investors injured by Defendant's fraudulent embezzlement of funds. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (kpa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
