Robert Stanger v. China Electric Motor, Inc. et al
| Robert Stanger |
| China Electric Motor, Inc., Heung Sang Fong, Roth Capital Partners, LLC, Fugui Wang, Yu Wang, WestPark Capital, Inc. and Haixia Zhang |
| 2:2011cv02794 |
| April 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
216
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL ATTORNEYS' FEES AFTER NINTH CIRCUIT MANDATE by Judge Manuel L. Real: Upon Plaintiffs Counsel's Request for Additional Attorneys' Fees, in conjunction with the Ninth Circuit's Mandate 200 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Counsel is to be awarded an additional $478,545.00 in attorneys' fees. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
189
ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, The Litigation and the Complaint as to the China Electric Defendants,MaloneBailey, Roth, the WestPark Defendants, and the Kempisty Defendants arehereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs. Excl usive jurisdiction is hereby retained over China Electric, MaloneBailey, Roth, the WestPark Defendants, the Kempisty Defendants and theSettlement Class Members for all matters relating to the Litigation, (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (SEE ATTACHED FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
