Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Michael Perry
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
| Michael Perry |
| 2:2011cv05561 |
| July 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Otis D Wright |
| Banks and Banking |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 58 by Judge Otis D Wright, II: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the entire above captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and that the parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action. Case terminated (Made JS-6) (jre)
|
|
Filing
49
AMENDED ORDER Denying Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss 18 , 34 by Judge Otis D Wright II. Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES Defendants Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), the Court finds the instant or der involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate interlocutory appeal therefrom may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation. (sch) Modified on 2/21/2012 (sch).
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 18 by Judge Otis D Wright II. Based on the foregoing, the Court DENIES Defendants Motion to Dismiss in its entirety. (See Order for Details). (sch)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
