Charles Nichols v. Edmund G Brown Jr et al
| Charles Nichols |
| Edmund G Brown, Jr, City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Does 1 to 10, Kamala D Harris, Officer Todd Heywood and Joseph Leonardi |
| 2:2011cv09916 |
| November 30, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| S James Otero |
| Karen E Scott |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 189 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report by Plaintiff and Defendants filed by Defendants Edmund G Brown, Jr, Kamala D Harris. (Haddad, Lara) |
| Filing 188 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Lara Haddad on behalf of Defendants Xavier Becerra, Edmund G Brown, Jr, Kamala D Harris, Gavin Newsom (Attorney Lara Haddad added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft), Attorney Lara Haddad added to party Edmund G Brown, Jr(pty:dft), Attorney Lara Haddad added to party Kamala D Harris(pty:dft), Attorney Lara Haddad added to party Gavin Newsom(pty:dft))(Haddad, Lara) |
Filing 187
ORDER RE APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC FILING by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Granting #186 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non-sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (es)
|
| Filing 186 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (es) |
|
Filing 185
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order Requiring Parties to File Status Report by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before November 15, 2022, the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint status report addressing the following questions: See Order for details. (es)
|
| Filing 184 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE due to Unavailability of Judicial Officer filed. The previously assigned Magistrate Judge is no longer available. Pursuant to directive of the Chief Magistrate Judge and in accordance with the rules of this Court, the case has been returned to the Clerk for reassignment. This case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all proceedings in accordance with General Order 05-07. Case number will now read as 2:11-cv-09916 SSS(KES). (rn) |
| Filing 183 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jonathan Michael Eisenberg counsel for Defendants Xavier Becerra, Edmund G Brown, Jr, Kamala D Harris, Gavin Newsom. Jonathan Michael Eisenberg is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Gavin Newsom, Governor of California. (Attorney Jonathan Michael Eisenberg added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft), Attorney Jonathan Michael Eisenberg added to party Gavin Newsom(pty:dft))(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 182 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Robert Leslie Meyerhoff on behalf of Defendants Xavier Becerra, Edmund G Brown, Jr, Kamala D Harris, Gavin Newsom (Attorney Robert Leslie Meyerhoff added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Leslie Meyerhoff added to party Edmund G Brown, Jr(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Leslie Meyerhoff added to party Kamala D Harris(pty:dft), Attorney Robert Leslie Meyerhoff added to party Gavin Newsom(pty:dft))(Meyerhoff, Robert) |
| Filing 181 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE upon Receipt of Mandate filed. This case having been returned on a mandate from the 9th CCA, Vacating and Remanding the decision of Judge S. James Otero and requiring judicial action, this case has been reassigned to Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes for all further proceedings. Case number will now read 2:11-cv-09916 SSS(SS). (rn) |
|
Filing 180
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. The district court's judgment is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the United States Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen, 597 U.S. ____ (2022). The parties shall bear their own attorney's fees, costs, and expenses. This order constitutes the mandate of this court. VACATED AND REMANDED.(mat)
|
|
Filing 179
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the impact of the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn, Inc. v. Bruen, No. 20-843 (June 23, 2022) on this case. The appellants brief shall be filed no later than July 25, 2022. (mat)
|
|
Filing 178
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. Submission of this case remains vacated pending a decision by the Supreme Court on the petition for a writ of certiorari in Young v. Hawaii, No. 20-1639. (mat)
|
| Filing 177 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Peiyin Patty Li counsel for Defendants Gavin Newsom, Xavier Becerra. Adding P. Patty Li as counsel of record for Defendants for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendants Gavin Newsom and Xavier Becerra. (Attorney Peiyin Patty Li added to party Gavin Newsom(pty:dft), Attorney Peiyin Patty Li added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft))(Li, Peiyin) |
|
Filing 176
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. Submission of this case remains vacated pending issuance of the mandate in Young v. Hawaii, No. 12-17808.(mat)
|
|
Filing 175
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. Submission of this case is vacated pending issuance of a decision in Young v. State of Hawai'i, No. 12-17808. (mat)
|
|
Filing 174
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. Appellant's unopposed motion (docket entry 23) to further stay appellate proceedings pending disposition of the petitions for full court rehearing in Peruta v. County of San Diego, case no. 10-56971, and Richards v. Prieto, case no. 11-16255, is granted. This case is stayed until November 17, 2016. [See document for further information] (car)
|
|
Filing 173
ORDER from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #168 filed by Charles Nichols. CCA # 14-55873. Appellant's unopposed motion to stay appellate proceedings pending disposition of two en banc cases, Peruta v. County of San Diego, case no. 10-56791, and Richards v. Prieto, case no. 11-16255, is granted. [See document for details] (mat)
|
|
Filing 172
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 168 filed by Charles Nichols, CCA # 14-55873. Appellant's motion to file sur-reply in opposition to appellees motion to stay proceedings is granted. Appellees opposed motion to stay proceedings pending the courts ruling whether to grant the petition for en banc review in Richards v. Prieto, No. 11- 16255 is granted. Within 90 days after the date of this order or within 14 daysafter the court rules on the petition for en banc review in Richards, whicheveroccurs first, appellees shall file an appropriate motion addressing the status of thisappeal and requesting a further stay or other relief. Appellant's unopposed motion for an extension to file a shortened opening brief is granted. Order received in this district on 1/21/15. [See document for details] (mat)
|
| Filing 171 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 109 , CCA # 13-56203. On May 1, 2014, the district court entered a final order dismissing the underlying action. Consequently, this preliminary injunction appeal is dismissed as moot. Appellant's appeal from the district court's final judgment is proceeding in this court as appeal number 14-55873. Mandate received in this district on 7/3/2014. (car) |
|
Filing 170
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 109 filed by Charles Nichols CCA # 13-56203. On May 1, 2014, the district court entered a final order dismissing the underlying action. Consequently, this preliminary injunction appeal is dismissed as moot. See SEC v. Mount Vernon Meml Park, 664 F.2d 1358, 1361 (9th Cir. 1982) (district courts entry of final judgment renders pending appeal from preliminary injunction moot). Appellant's appeal from the district court's final judgment is proceeding in this court as appeal number 14-55873. All pending motions are denied as moot. Order received in this district on 6/10/2014. (dmap)
|
| Filing 169 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 14-55873, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 168 as to Petitioner Charles Nichols. (ja) |
| Filing 168 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Petitioner Charles Nichols. Appeal of Judgment # 167 Filed On: 5/1/14; Entered On: 5/1/14; Filing fee $505 PAID, receipt number LA096419. (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Fee receipt) (mat) |
| Filing 167 JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero, Related to: R&R - ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, # 166 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mr) |
|
Filing 166
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge S. James Otero. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED and that Judgment be entered in favor of Defendant Kamala D. Harris. (mr)
|
| Filing 164 REPLY TO OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued) # 162 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 165
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, ORDERING Request for Ruling on Submitted Matter (2) submitted by Plaintiff Charles Nichols received on 4/09/14 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Both parties have not signed the document. (mr)
|
| Filing 163 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued) # 162 filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols.(mr) |
| Filing 162 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re Complaint, # 1 , MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, # 131 , MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, # 129 . (mr) |
| Filing 161 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2014. (mr) |
| Filing 160 DECLARATION of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Regarding Notice of Supplemental Authority # 159 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (es) |
| Filing 159 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY # 131 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (es) |
| Filing 158 Plaintiff's RESPONSE to Defendant Harris' Objection to Plaintiff's Notice of Supplemental Authority # 157 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols (es) |
| Filing 157 Objection re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 , MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Pleadings of Charles Nichols, # 129 Four Supplemental Filings filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 156 DECLARATION re Notice of Supplemental Authority # 155 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 155 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 154 DECLARATION re Notice (Other) # 153 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 153 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 152 DECLARATION re Notice of Supplemental Authority # 150 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 151 RESPONSE to Objections - non-motion # 149 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 150 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 149 OBJECTIONS to Supplemental Filing filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 148 DECLARATION of Plaintiff Charles Nichols Regarding Notice of Supplemental Authority, # 147 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) Modified on 12/16/2013 (mr). |
| Filing 147 NOTICE of Supplemental Authority filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 146 Plaintiff's Objections to Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg filed in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, # 131 . (lmh) Modified on 12/13/2013 (mr). |
| Filing 145 Plaintiff's Objections to Defendant's Notice of Errata filed in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, # 131 . (lmh) Modified on 12/13/2013 (mr). |
| Filing 144 Reply to Defendant's State of Genuine Disputes re Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) Modified on 12/13/2013 (mr). |
| Filing 143 Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) Modified on 12/13/2013 (mr). |
| Filing 142 REPLY in Support of MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Pleadings of Charles Nichols, # 129 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 141 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. correcting Objection/Opposition (Motion related) # 140 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of P's and A's in Opp'n to MSJ, # 2 Affidavit of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 140 Opposition re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix of Genuine Disputes, # 2 Affidavit of Jonathan M. Eisenberg, # 3 Affidavit of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 139 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings # 129 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (mr) |
| Filing 138 Plaintiff Nichols' Objection to Evidence re: MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Pleadings of Charles Nichols, # 129 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (mr) |
|
Filing 137
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, On November 8, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which was entered on the Courts docket on November 15, 2013. (Dkt. No. 131). The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Defendants Opposition shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiffs Reply, if necessary, shall be filed within seven (7) days of service of the Opposition. Thereafter, the Motion will be taken under submission without a hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for December 17, 2013 is VACATED. re: MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 . (lmh)
|
|
Filing 130
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER: (1) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND (2) VACATING HEARING DATE (Dkt. No. # 129 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's Opposition shall be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Defendant's Reply, if necessary, shall be filed within seven (7) days of service of the Opposition. Thereafter, the Motion will be taken under submission without a hearing unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Accordingly, the hearing date currently set for December 17, 2013 is VACATED. If Plaintiff does not intend to oppose the Motion, he may request a voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). A Notice of Dismissal form is attached for Plaintiff's convenience. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Dismissal Form) (mr)
|
| Filing 129 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Pleadings of Charles Nichols, filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. Motion set for hearing on 12/17/2013 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of P's and A's, # 2 Appendix (RFJN), # 3 Declaration of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 136 NOTICE OF LODGING of Proposed Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law; Evidence in Support filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols re MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 (lmh) |
| Filing 135 NOTICE OF LODGING of Proposed Order filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols re MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 (lmh) |
| Filing 134 EXHIBIT A through H to MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits Part 2)(lmh) |
| Filing 133 DECLARATION of Charles Nichols in Support MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 132 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment # 131 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lmh) |
| Filing 131 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. Motion set for hearing on 12/17/2013 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Lodged Proposed Order) (lmh) |
|
Filing 128
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 109 filed by Charles Nichols, CCA # 13-56203. The court stays proceedings in this appeal pending this court's decisions in Richards v. Prieto, 11-16255, Peruta v. County of San Diego, 10-56971, and Baker v. Kealoha, 12-16258 (arg. & sub. SF 12/6/12 DFO SRT CMC). Order received in this district on 10/15/13. (car)
|
|
Filing 126
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING CITY OF REDONDO BEACH'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AND THIRD CLAIMS IN THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT (Dkt. No. # 89 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On August 5, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) dismissing his claims against Defendant City of Redondo Beach and Does 1 to 10 without prejudice. (Dkt. No. # 125 ). Accordingly, City of Redondo Beach's pending Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED as MOOT. (Dkt. No. # 89 ). (mr)
|
| Filing 127 STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 125 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL without prejudice against defendant City of Redondo Beach and Does 1 to 10 pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
|
Filing 124
ORDER from 9th CCA filed, CCA # 13-56203. Appellant's emergency motion to stay district court proceedings pending appeal is denied. Appellant's motion to expedite this preliminary injunction appeal is denied as unnecessary. Order received in this district on 8/2/13. (car)
|
| Filing 123 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 122 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach. (Pierce, Thomas) |
| Filing 121 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR STAY PENDING APPEAL # 116 . (lc) |
| Filing 120 Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Pending Appeal # 116 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 119 Opposition of Defendant City of Redondo Beach re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Pending Appeal # 116 (Pierce, Thomas) |
| Filing 118 MEMORANDUM, Reasons and Points and Authorities in Support Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to Stay Case Pending Appeal # 116 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (dmap) |
| Filing 117 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF LODGING (Proposed) Order Staying Further District Court Proceedings filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending Pending Appeal # 116 . (dmap) |
| Filing 116 PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Pending Appeal filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols.(dmap) |
| Filing 115 Plaintiff's Notice Of Potential Partial Mootness Against Defendant City of Redondo Beach filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (dmap) |
| Filing 114 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Order denying the Certificate of Appealability # 113 for CV 12-2558 GAF, Rranklin Ross Knisley was mistakenly docketed into this case. The order will be docketed in the correct case CV 12-2558 GAF. (dmap) |
| Filing 111 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 13-56203 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 109 as to Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (dmap) |
| Filing 110 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to Plaintiff Charles Nichols re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 109 . (dmap) |
| Filing 112 APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals # 109 as to Plaintiff Charles Nichols; Receipt Number: LA074294 in the amount of $455. (dmap) |
| Filing 109 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plainitff Charles Nichols. Appeal of Order on Motion for Preliminary Injunction # 108 . Filed On: 7/3/2013; Entered On: 7/3/2013; Filing fee $455.00 billed. (dmap) |
|
Filing 113
Order by Judge S. James Otero denying certificate of appealability. (dmap)
|
|
Filing 108
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge S. James Otero:ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 58 . The Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Segal for further proceedings. (lc)
|
|
Filing 107
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. This Order governs discovery and pretrial motions. All discovery shall be completed on or before October 31, 2013. All discovery motions shall be filed and served on or before October 31, 2013. All other motions, including but not limited to motions for summary judgment, shall be filed and served on or before November 13, 2013. The deadline for amending pleadings and/or adding parties is June 28, 2013. Each party shall file and serve a Status Report on or before August 12, 2013. (See document for further details). (mr)
|
| Filing 106 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST for Judicial Notice and REPLY to defendant Kamala D. Harris's Evidentiary Objections # 96 to declaration of Charles Nichols filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 105 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY to defendant Kamala D. Harri's Opposition to Plaintiff Charles Nichols's Motion for Preliminary Injuction # 96 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 104 Opposition re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion # 85 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Request for Judicial Notice, # 2 Affidavit Jonathan Eisenberg Declaration, # 3 Exhibit Exh. A, # 4 Exhibit Exh. B, # 5 Appendix Evidentiary Objections, # 6 Declaration Certificate of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 103 Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant City of Redondo Beach's Evidentiary Objections to Plaintiff's Declaration Submitted in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss # 99 . (mr) |
| Filing 102 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge S. James Otero: ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 96 ; STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FORPRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 100 .Defendant shall re-file her Opposition in accordance with this Court's Initial Standing Order on or before May 28, 2013. Plaintiff shall re-file his Reply in accordance with this Court'sInitial Standing Order on or before June 3, 2013. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument # 85 , and thus no appearances are necessary. See Fed. R. Civ. P.78(b). (lc) |
| Filing 101 PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND REPLY TO DEFENDANT KAMALA D. HARRIS'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF CHARLES NICHOLS filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lc) |
| Filing 100 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT KAMALA D. HARRIS'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF CHARLES NICHOLS'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION # 85 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lc) |
| Filing 99 Evidentiary Objections in support of re: MOTION to Dismiss Case # 89 the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach. (Pierce, Thomas) |
| Filing 98 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION to Dismiss Case # 89 the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint; Declaration of T. Peter Pierce in Support filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach. (Pierce, Thomas) |
| Filing 97 REPLY in support of a motion MOTION to Dismiss Case # 89 the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint, or in the Alternative, in Support of Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach. (Pierce, Thomas) |
| Filing 96 Opposition to Preliminary Injunction Motion Opposition to Mtn. for Preliminary Injunction re: MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion # 85 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Attachments: # 1 Request for Judicial Notice, # 2 Declaration of Jonathan M. Eisenberg, # 3 Exhibit A to JME Decl., # 4 Exhibit B to JME Decl., # 5 Evidentiary Objections, # 6 Proof of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 95 Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion By Defendant City of Redondo Beach to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint or, In the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 89 , Etc.; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declaration of Charles Nichols filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (mr) |
|
Filing 94
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE DEFENDANT CITY OF REDONDO BEACH'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. No. # 89 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 15, 2013, Defendant City of Redondo Beach filed a Motion to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. # 89 ). Plaintiff shall have until May 3, 2013 to file and serve an Opposition to the Motion. Defendant shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to file and serve a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motion will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for May 21, 2013 be taken off calendar. (See document for further details). (mr)
|
|
Filing 93
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER VACATING HEARING DATE ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. No. # 85 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 10, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt. No. # 85 ). Plaintiff set May 20, 2013 as the hearing date on the Motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-15, the hearing date of May 20, 2013 is VACATED and no appearance is necessary, unless otherwise advised by the Court. (mr)
|
|
Filing 92
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Dkt. No. # 85 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 10, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Defendants' Opposition, if any, is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, i.e., by May 2, 2013. Plaintiff's Reply is due seven (7) days from the date of service of the Opposition. (mr)
|
| Filing 91 ANSWER to Amended Complaint # 83 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris.(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 90 MEMORANDUM in Support of Defendant City of Redondo Beach's Motion to Dismiss the Second and third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, in Support of Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach. (Pierce, Thomas) |
| Filing 89 NOTICE of Motion and Motion by Defendant City of Redondo Beach to Dismiss the Second and Third Claims in the Second Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant City of Redondo Beach. (Pierce, Thomas) Modified on 4/16/2013 (mr). |
| Filing 88 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion # 85 filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lc) |
| Filing 87 DECLARATION of Charles Nichols in support MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion # 85 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lc) |
| Filing 86 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion # 85 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lc) |
| Filing 85 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Motion filed by plaintiff: Charles Nichols. Motion set for hearing on 5/20/2013 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (lc) |
|
Filing 84
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SCHEDULING ORDER RE RESPONSE DEADLINE TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (Dkt. No. # 83 ) by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On April 1, 2013, Plaintiff in the above-referenced pro se civil rights action filed a Second Amended Complaint. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(3), Defendants shall file a response to the Second Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. (mr)
|
| Filing 83 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending First Amended Complaint # 47 , filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
|
Filing 82
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge S. James Otero. The Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint # 54 filed by the Redondo Beach Defendants is GRANTED. The Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint # 58 filed by Attorney General Kamala D. Harris is DENIED. The First Amended Complaint # 47 is DISMISSED with leave to amend. If Plaintiff desires to proceed with his claims against Attorney General Harris and City of Redondo Beach, Plaintiff shall file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. (See Order for details) (afe)
|
| Filing 81 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 80 NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 79 NOTICE of Related Case [Local Rule 83-1.3(b)] filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 78 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY Moore, et al. and Shepard, et al.v. Madigan, Nos 12-1269, 12-1788 Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 77 SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
|
Filing 76
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. granting # 75 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Michael F Sisson terminated. (afe)
|
| Filing 75 Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (jy) |
|
Filing 74
NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal ORDERING Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney submitted by Plaintiff Charles Nichols received on 12/20/12 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (jy)
|
| Filing 73 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE to defendant Kamala D. Harris's Objections # 72 to November 20, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 72 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued) # 71 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris.(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 71 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint # 54 and Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 58 (jy) |
| Filing 70 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Objections to R&R due by 12/4/2012 (jy) |
| Filing 69 REPLY in Support of Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) # 58 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Service)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 68 REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS' EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF NICHOLS DECLARATION FILED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT - IN SUPPORT OF re: MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Todd Heywood, Joseph Leonardi. (Bond, Lisa) |
| Filing 67 REPLY REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Todd Heywood, Joseph Leonardi. (Bond, Lisa) |
| Filing 66 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 , Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) # 58 Request for Judicial Notice filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (Sisson, Michael) |
| Filing 65 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) # 58 by Defendant Kamala Harris filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (Sisson, Michael) |
| Filing 64 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 by Defendant Redondo Beach et al filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (Sisson, Michael) |
|
Filing 63
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting # 62 Request to Substitute Attorney. (jy)
|
| Filing 62 REQUEST to Substitute attorney Michael F. Sisson in place of attorney Charles Nichols filed by Attorney Charles Nichols. Request set for hearing on 7/13/2012 at 01:30 PM before Judge S. James Otero. (Sisson, Michael) |
|
Filing 61
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: On June 29, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, Motions to Dismiss were filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Joseph Leonardi, Todd Heywood and California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris. Plaintiff shall have until July 16, 2012 to serve and file Oppositions to the Motions. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Oppositions to serve and file Replies, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearings set for July 31, 2012 be taken off calendar. See minute order for details. (jy)
|
| Filing 60 PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION to substitution of attorney # 53 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
|
Filing 59
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: granting # 53 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Michael W Webb terminated (jy)
|
| Filing 58 NOTICE OF MOTION AND Second MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction per FRCP 12(b)(1) filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. Motion set for hearing on 7/31/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of P's and A's Supporting Dismissal, # 2 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 57 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 ([Proposed] Order) filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Todd Heywood, Joseph Leonardi. (Bond, Lisa) |
| Filing 56 DECLARATION of Lisa Bond in support of MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Todd Heywood, Joseph Leonardi. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Bond, Lisa) |
| Filing 55 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement # 54 filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Todd Heywood, Joseph Leonardi. (Bond, Lisa) |
| Filing 54 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint , or, in the Alternative, Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Todd Heywood, Joseph Leonardi. Motion set for hearing on 7/31/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Bond, Lisa) |
| Filing 53 REQUEST to Substitute attorney Lisa Bond in place of attorney Michael W. Webb filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, Joseph Leonardi. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Order on Request for Approval of Substitution of Attorney)(Bond, Lisa) |
|
Filing 52
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: ORDER CLARIFYING DEADLINE FOR RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; the Court extends the deadline by one day and ORDERS Harris, Leonardi and City of Redondo Beach to file a response to the First Amended Complaint by Friday, June 29, 2012. See order for further details. (jy)
|
| Filing 51 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols, re Summons Issued, Amended Complaint # 47 served on 06/07/12. (afe) |
| Filing 50 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols, re Summons Issued, Amended Complaint # 47 served on 06/07/12. (afe) |
| Filing 49 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols, re Summons Issued, Amended Complaint # 47 served on 06/07/12. (afe) |
| Filing 48 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols, re Summons Issued, Amended Complaint # 47 served on 06/07/12. (afe) |
| 60 DAY AMENDED Summons Issued re Amended Complaint # 47 as to defendant City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Kamala D Harris (Attorney General in her official capacity as Attorney General of California), Officer Todd Heywood. (afe) |
| Filing 47 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending Complaint # 1 filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (jy) (Additional attachment(s): # 2 Amended Summons) |
|
Filing 46
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge S. James Otero; Plaintiffs claims against Attorney General Kamala D. Harris are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). See order for further details. (jy)
|
| Filing 45 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS)by Judge S. James Otero: The Court deems the Plaintiff's MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation # 41 as an objection. Accordingly, the Court takes the hearing off its calendar. (lc) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. correcting MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation re Report and Recommendation (Issued) # 40 # 41 (jy) |
| Filing 43 REPLY TO OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation (Issued) # 40 filed by Defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr. and Defendant Kamala D. Harris (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 42 MEMORANDUM in Support of MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation re Report and Recommendation # 41 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (lc) (Main Document 42 replaced on 8/8/2014) (tad). |
| Filing 41 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Review of Magistrate Judges report and recommendation # 40 filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. Motion set for hearing on 5/24/2012 at 10:00 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (lc) |
| Filing 40 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Re Complaint # 1 (jy) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. Objections to R&R due by 4/19/2012 (jy) |
| Filing 38 REPLY in Support of MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 34 filed by Defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 37 DECLARATION of Charles Nichols re Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition # 36 filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 36 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss # 34 by defendant Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as governor of California, filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
|
Filing 35
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal re: MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 34 . On March 8, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, a Motion to Dismiss was filed by Defendant Gov. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Plaintiff shall have until March 23, 2012 to serve and file an Opposition to the Motion. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to serve and file a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motion will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearing set for April 10, 2012 be taken off calendar. See minute order for further details. (jy)
|
| Filing 34 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr. Motion set for hearing on 4/10/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 33 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols, Complaint - (Referred) # 1 , Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) # 3 served on 02/16/12. (afe) |
| Filing 32 Reply to Order Directing Plaintiff to File Response Regarding Application for Entry of Default filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (jy) |
|
Filing 31
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: DENYING THE REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR A HEARING (Dkt. Nos. # 25 - # 26 ); See minute order for details. (jy)
|
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Error in Submission of Application for Default Judgment Against Defendant Brown filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (jy) |
|
Filing 29
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: the Court directs Plaintiff to file a response within seven (7) days (February 22, 2012) of the date of this Order stating whether he wishes to withdraw his Application. See minute order for further details. (jy)
|
| Filing 28 REPLY Support MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 13 filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 27 REPLY Reply MOTION to Dismiss Case # 12 Reply filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Joseph Leonardi. (Webb, Michael) |
| Filing 26 Objection Support re: MOTION to Dismiss Case # 12 Objections To Plaintiff's Notice of Lodging filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Joseph Leonardi. (Webb, Michael) |
| Filing 25 Objection Support re: MOTION to Dismiss Case # 12 Redondo Beach Defendants' Objections To Plaintiff's Two Requests For Judicial Notice; Request for Hearing filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Joseph Leonardi. (Webb, Michael) |
| Filing 23 Application for Entry of Default Opposition re: APPLICATION for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr # 22 filed by Defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 24 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE of recently decided 9TH CIRCUIT opinion in support of plaintiff's opposition to motions to dismiss by Redondo Beach defendants and Motion to dismiss by defendant Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General in her official capacity as Attorney General of California, re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 13 , filed by Plainfiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 22 APPLICATION for Entry of Default against defendant Edmund G Brown, Jr filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. (jy) |
| Filing 21 DECLARATION of Charles Nichols, filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (afe) |
| Filing 20 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF LODGING OF COMPUTER DISC CONTAINING VIDEOS REFERENCED AS EXHIBIT 1-l TO l-4 IN PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS BY REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS,filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols. re Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition (non-motion) # 19 (afe) |
| Filing 19 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TODISMISS BY REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS, filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. Re: MOTION to Dismiss Case # 12 (afe) |
| Filing 18 PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT KAMALA HARRIS' MOTION TO DISMISS, filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. Re: MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 13 (afe) |
| Filing 17 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS BY REDONDO BEACH DEFENDANTS AND MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT KAMALA D. HARRIS ATTORNEY GENERAL IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA. re MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 13 , filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols.(afe) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT TO PROCEED before a U. S. Magistrate Judge in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), consent is hereby DECLINED by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (jy) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Errata filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. (Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: re: MOTION to Dismiss Case # 12 and MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction # 13 . On January 30, 2012, in the above-entitled civil rights action, Motions to Dismiss were filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach and City of Redondo Beach Police Department and by Defendant Kamala D. Harris. Plaintiff shall have until February 14, 2012 to serve and file an Opposition to the Motions. Defendants shall have seven (7) days from service of the Opposition to serve and file a Reply, if necessary. Thereafter, the Motions will be deemed submitted without oral argument. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the hearings set for March 6, 2012 be taken off calendar. (jy)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Kamala D Harris. Motion set for hearing on 3/6/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum Supporting P's and A's)(Eisenberg, Jonathan) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Joseph Leonardi. Motion set for hearing on 3/6/2012 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, # 2 Proposed Order)(Webb, Michael) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal: denying # 10 Ex Parte Application to Seal; Plaintiffs Application is DENIED. Plaintiff fails to explain his purpose in filing the Report or provide any compelling reason that would justify filing the Report under seal. There is no pending motion and Defendants have not yet answered the Complaint. Furthermore, the Application fails to comply with the Local Rules governing ex parte applications. See minute order for further details. (jy)
|
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Submit Document Under Seal and Request for Waiver of Notice filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols.(jy) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Charles Nichols, re Complaint # 1 , Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) # 3 served on 01/09/12. (afe) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Charles Nichols, Complaint # 1 , Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) # 3 served on 01/09/12. (afe) |
| Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Charles Nichols, re Complaint - # 1 , Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) # 3 served on 01/09/12. (afe) |
| Filing 6 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFF Charles Nichols, re Complaint # 1 , Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) # 3 served on 01/09/12. (afe) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Charles Nichols, re Complaint # 1 , Notice of Reference to a U S Magistrate Judge (CV-25) # 3 served on 01/09/12. (afe) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER GOVERNING PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal, See order for details. (jy)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (et) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Edmund G Brown, Jr, City of Redondo Beach, City of Redondo Beach Police Department, Does 1 to 10, Kamala D Harris, Joseph Leonardi. Case assigned to Judge S. James Otero and referred to Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal.(Filing fee$350 Paid.), filed by Plaintiff Charles Nichols. [Summons not issued on 11/30/2011] (et) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/10/2012: # 1 Summons) (afe). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
