Jackeline Chavez v. Michael J Astrue

Jackeline Chavez v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Jackeline Chavez
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2011cv10643
Filed:	December 22, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge:	George H Wu
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 11, 2013	Filing 29 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. Based upon the parties' Stipulation 27 28 for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS SO ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,300.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. section 2412 and costs in the amount of $60.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. section 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (dro)
December 3, 2012	Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that (1) the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed; (2) the Commissioner's favorable determinations dated November 17, 2009 and December 28, 2009 are reins tated, and this matter is remanded for the payment of all benefits attendant thereto; and (3) subject to (2), this matter also is remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).Related to: Joint Stipulation for Social Security Cases 21 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 11, 2013

Filing 29 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. Based upon the parties' Stipulation 27 28 for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: IT IS SO ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $5,300.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. section 2412 and costs in the amount of $60.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. section 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. (dro)

December 3, 2012

Filing 26 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that (1) the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed; (2) the Commissioner's favorable determinations dated November 17, 2009 and December 28, 2009 are reins tated, and this matter is remanded for the payment of all benefits attendant thereto; and (3) subject to (2), this matter also is remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).Related to: Joint Stipulation for Social Security Cases 21 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackeline Chavez v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jackeline Chavez
Represented By:	Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?