Anthony Yuzwa v. M V Oosterdam et al
||M V Oosterdam, Stiletto Entertainment, Stiletto Television Inc, Does and Holland America Line Inc
||March 28, 2012
||California Central District Court
||Christina A. Snyder
||Andrew J. Wistrich
|Nature of Suit:
||Marine Product Liability
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 14, 2013
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER FOR ALLOWING FILING OF FIRST AMENDED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [DTK.44] No by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds that plaintiff's ex parte application should be DENIED. Plaintiff may not amend his motion for leave to file a first amended complaint to avail himself, retroactively, of the deadline for amending pleadings. (bp)
|June 25, 2013
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File the proposed Second Amended Complaint 51 . The Clerk shall file the proposed SAC forthwith. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|January 16, 2014
ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Stipulation 72 , Plaintiff's entire Second Amended Complaint, and all causes of action therein be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to all defendants named therein, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Stiletto Television, Inc., which was a named defendant that was dismissed without prejudice earlier in the litigation, is now deemed to be dismissed with prejudice. All parties are to bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.