Estate of Jonathan Najera et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Alfredo Najera, Antonia Najera and Estate of Jonathan Najera |
Sheriff Leroy Baca, County of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department |
2:2012cv03167 |
April 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dolly M. Gee |
Michael R. Wilner |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 FINAL JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: Plaintiffs THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN NAJERA, ANTONIA NAJERA and ALFREDO NAJERA are hereby awarded attor neys' fees in the amount of $312,578.49, to be apportioned as follows: (a) R. Samuel Paz: $60,767.37; (b) Sonia M. Mercado & Associates: $182,340.62; (c) Law Offices of Mark Pachowicz: $69,470.50. Plaintiffs are awarded costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 in the amount of $4,321.29, to be apportioned as follows: (d) Sonia M. Mercado & Associates: $2,277.65; (e) Law Offices of Mark Pachowicz: $2,043.64. (gk) |
Filing 17 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 8/29/2012 at 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 8/27/2012 at noon. (See Minute Order for further details) (vm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.