Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Gordon et al
| Consumer Financial Protection Bureau |
| Division One Investment and Loan Inc, Chance Edward Gordon, Gordon Law Firm PC, Abraham Michael Pessar and Processing Division LLC |
| Robb Evans and Associates LLC |
| 2:2012cv06147 |
| July 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Michael R. Wilner |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
217
ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST CHANCE E. GORDON by Judge Percy Anderson, in favor of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau against Chance E Gordon in the principal amount of $8,606,280.86 Related to: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, 215 . (See document for specifics) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
188
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Percy Anderson: It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Chance Gordon and The Gordon Law Firm, P.C. (collectively, the "Gordon Defendants") whether acting directly or thro ugh any other person, are permanently restrained, enjoined, and prohibited from directly or indirectly engaging in any conduct in violation of the Consumer Financial Protection Act, 12 U.S.C. Sections 5531(a), 5536(a), 5564, & 5565, and the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule, 12 C.F.R. Section 1015, etc. A judgment for equitable monetary relief is hereby entered in favor of the plaintiff Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and against the Gordon Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $11,403,338.63, with post-judgment interest at the legal rate. See document for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (gk)
|
|
Filing
102
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS AS TO DEFENDANTS ABRAHAM MICHAEL PESSAR, DIVISION ONE INVESTMENT AND LOAN, INC., AND PROCESSING DIVISION, L.L.C. by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 98 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Abraham Michael Pessar, Division One Investment and Loan, Inc., and Processing Division, L.L.C. (collectively "Settling Defendants") whether acting directly or through any other person, are permanently rest rained and enjoined re any mortgage assistance or debt relief product or service, etc. Within ten days of the Court's entry ofthis Order, Settling Defendants shall pay the one dollar ($1) civil-money penalty in the form of a wire transfer t o the Bureau or to such agent as the Bureau may direct, and in accordance with wiring instructions to be provided by counsel for the CFPB, in accordance with section 1017(d) of the CFPA, Section 12 U.S.C. 5497(d). A judgment for equitable monetary re lief and damages is hereby entered in favor of the Bureau and against the Settling Defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $10,000,000; provided, however, that full payment of this judgment shall be suspended upon satisfaction of the obligations in this order. Settling Defendants hereby grant to the Bureau all rights and claims they have to their frozen assets currently in the possession, custody, or control of the Temporary Receiver ("Pessar Funds"), and shall forfeit any rights to the Pessar Funds in the Receivership Estate. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
80
PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Judge Percy Anderson. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
76
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Percy Anderson. See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
