Roseanne Aguilar v. City of South Gate et al
| Roseanne Aguilar |
| City of South Gate and Does |
| 2:2012cv10669 |
| December 13, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Otis D Wright |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER RE STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ENTIRE ACTION 86 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The matter is dismissed as to remaining Defendants Scott, Bolar, Dedetti, Dahlia and Tait. The hearing on the OSC Re Settlement set for 10/8/2013, at 1:30 p.m. is VACATED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jre)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On September 4, 2013, mediator Keith Parker filed a Mediation Report informing the Court that the case fully settled at the mediation. 83 The Court therefore ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE why settlement has not been finalized and sets a hearing on the matter for Monday, October 7, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. This hearing will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal. All pretrial and trial dates are vacated. IT IS SO ORDERED. (cch)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT OFFICERS DAVID SCOTTS, ROBERT TAITS, AND SANDRA DAHLIAS MOTION TO DISMISS 39 , 40 ,[ 41] AND DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 56 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Aguilar may file a Second Amended Complaint no later than Au gust 19, 2013, to amend her Bane Act claim against all defendants and to amend her assault-and battery claim against Defendant Scott. Aguilar is not permitted leave to amend any other claim.the Court amends the case-management schedule in this matter as follows: Jury trial: 1/28/14 9:00 AM; File final trial exhibit stipulation: 1/23/14; hearing on motions in limine: 1/17/14 2:30 PM; Final Pretrial Conference: 1/6/14 2:30 PM; motions in limine, proposed voir dire questions and proposed voir dire questions and agreed to statement of case: 1/6/14; lodged Pretrial conference order and pretrial exhibit stipulation, file contentions of fact and law, exhibit and witness lists, status report regarding settlement, agreed upon set of instructions an d verdict forms, joint statement regarding disputed instructions verdicts etc:12/30/13; last day for hearing motions: 12/09/13; last date to conduct settlement conference: 11/4/13;discovery cutoff: 10/28/13; last date to amend pleadings or add parties: 6/24/13. (lc). Modified on 8/8/2013 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING DATE AND TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL DATES 74 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Insofar as Plaintiff seeks a 60-day continuance for all of these dates, Plaint iffs request is DENIED for failure to demonstrate good cause. Nevertheless, Defendants have agreed to continue the summary-judgment hearing date to September 30 and the discovery cut-off date to November 8. Accordingly, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing date on Defendants pending motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 56) to Monday, September 30, 2013. Plaintiffs opposition is therefore due no later than September 9, 2013.The Court CONTINUES the discovery cut-off date to October 28, 2013. Finally, the Court directs counsel to review this Courts Local Rules regarding the form and format of electronic filings. In particular, Local Rule 5-4.3.1. (lc). Modified on 7/25/2013. (lc).
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT CITY OF SOUTH GATES MOTION TO DISMISS 17 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 1/25/2013 (lc).
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION 10 The Court hereby GRANTS the parties stipulation to continue the hearing date on Defendant City of South Gates motion to dismiss 7 . Based upon the parties agreed-upon February 11, 2013 hearing date, Plaintiffs oppositio n is due no later than January 21, and the Citys reply, if any, is due no later than January 28, 2013. The hearing date, however, is hereby VACATED; the Court will rule on the Citys motion on the papers, and no appearances are necessary unless otherwise ordered by the Court by Judge Otis D Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 1/2/2013 .(lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
