Payam Ahdoot v. Babolat VS North America Inc et al
Plaintiff: Payam Ahdoot
Defendant: Babolat VS North America Inc and Does
Case Number: 2:2013cv02823
Filed: April 22, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Gary A. Feess
Presiding Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 74 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips related to: Motion Related Document, 73 . (See document for specifics.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iva)
April 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT (DOC. NO. 62) AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES, COSTS, INCENTIVE AWARDS, AND ADMINISTRATION COSTS (DOC. NO. 63) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips re: 62 Motion for Settlement; 63 Motion for Attorney Fees. (See document for specifics) (mrgo)
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 57 Amended AMENDED MINUTES re: Order re: Modifying Preliminary Settlement Approval. Correct Final Approval Hearing date is April 6, 2015 not April 6, 2014. (smo)
September 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Order Requesting Further Briefing. Parties are seeking preliminary approval of their Settlement Agreement. The Court has two concerns that must be addressed before the Court will consider preliminari ly approving this settlement as a class action settlement. First, Plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees is made without any supporting billing records which prevents the Court from analyzing the reasonableness of the request. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to submit further briefing detailing specific information regarding the number of hours worked, the hourly rate for each attorney charging time to the case, and the reasonable hourly rate. Second, the Court is unable to d iscern if Rust Consulting, Inc., is an appropriate Settlement Administrator absent any information of any sort regarding Rust Consulting, Inc.'s anticipated fees. Accordingly, the court ORDERS Plaintiffs to submit further briefing detailing any agreed-upon fee in the services agreement with Rust Consulting, Inc. and/or any estimates of that fee amount. Plaintiffs are to submit this information by close of business on Thursday, September 18, 2014. See document for details. (smo)
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Order Vacating Hearing. The Court has received Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement agreement. (Docket No. 43 [Mot. for Preliminary Settlement Approval].) Th e Court takes these matters under submission. Accordingly, the hearing previously scheduled for September 8, 2014, is VACATED. Should the Court determine that argument of counsel is required for the resolution of this motion, a new hearing date will be scheduled. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. R. 7-15. (smo)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton. The parties in the above-entitled actions have submitted an AGREED CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER ("Confidenti ality Stipulation"). The Court, having reviewed the parties' Confidentiality Stipulation, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, hereby adopts the Confidentiality Stipulation as its Protective Order for the handling of "Confidential Information" as that term is defined by the parties' Confidentiality Stipulation. (26) (gr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payam Ahdoot v. Babolat VS North America Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Payam Ahdoot
Represented By: Christopher J Hamner
Represented By: Amy Tai Wootton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Babolat VS North America Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?