NetAirus Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc Featured Case
Plaintiff: NetAirus Technologies LLC
Defendant: Apple Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv03780
Filed: May 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: John A. Kronstadt
Nature of Suit: Patent
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 12, 2016 Filing 106 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 Final Judgment) (lom)
April 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 105 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court hereby enters final judgment in favor of Defendant Apple Inc. ("Apple") on Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC's ("NetAirus'S") claims for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,103,380 (the "'380 Patent") and Apple's counterclaims for non-infringement and invalidity of the '380 Patent. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that each of NetAirus's claims is dismissed with prejudice. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Apple is the prevailing party in this matter and is entitled to seek costs pursuant to F.R.C.P. 54(d)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
April 4, 2016 Filing 104 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Order on Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, 103 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Judgment)(Scarsi, Mark)
March 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 103 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 83 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. On or before April 4, 2016, Apple shall submit a proposed judgment. NetAirus shall file any objections to the form of the proposed judgment in conformance with the Local Rules no later than April 11, 2016. Because the Motion is granted, it is unnecessary to set dates for further proceedings. (lom)
March 17, 2016 Filing 102 JOINT STATUS REPORT of REGARDING SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
March 14, 2016 Filing 101 MINUTES OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (DKT. 81 ); DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DKT. 83 ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Court deems the Motion to Withdraw as MOOT. The Court takes the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings UNDER SUBMISSION and will issue a ruling. The scheduling conference is not held. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (ah)
March 11, 2016 Filing 100 First NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney John M Begakis on behalf of Counter Defendants NetAirus Technologies LLC, NetAirus Technologies LLC, Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC (Attorney John M Begakis added to party NetAirus Technologies LLC(pty:cd), Attorney John M Begakis added to party NetAirus Technologies LLC(pty:pla), Attorney John M Begakis added to party NetAirus Technologies LLC(pty:cd))(Begakis, John)
March 10, 2016 Filing 99 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Amended ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Counter Defendants NetAirus Technologies LLC, NetAirus Technologies LLC, Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC.. (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
March 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 98 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL TO FILE AMENDED JOINT RULE 16(b) REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has received the parties joint report (Dkt. 97 ), however, pursuant to this Court's Order setting the Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference, the Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates was to have been completed by both of the parties, to include proposed dates submitted by both parties and attached to the joint report. Counsel shall file an amended joint report with both parties' proposed dates no later than March 11, 2016 by 12 PM, to include the completed Schedule.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc5, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 4, 2016 Filing 97 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Counter Defendants NetAirus Technologies LLC, NetAirus Technologies LLC, Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC.. (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
February 22, 2016 Filing 96 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Invalidity of All Asserted Claims 83 filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Mark C. Scarsi, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Scarsi, Mark)
February 10, 2016 Filing 95 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Invalidity of All Asserted Claims 83 filed by Counter Defendants NetAirus Technologies LLC, NetAirus Technologies LLC, Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
February 10, 2016 Filing 94 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro of Niro, Haller & Niro; Mark B. Mizrahi of Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP; and Mark D. Roth of Orum & Roth, LLC to Withdraw as Attorney 81 filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Scarsi, Mark)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER GRANTING First Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference and Motion Hearings Dates (DKT. 82 , 83 ) 89 by Judge John A. Kronstadt that the existing Response Date, Hearings Dates, and Scheduling Conference Date are continued as follows: Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report on 3/4/2016. Scheduling Conference is continued to 3/14/2016 at 08:30 AM. (See attachment Order for further details). (jp)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court hereby orders that the request of: NETAIRUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff to substitute Kyri Tsircou as attorney of record instead of Mark Mizrahi,granting 88 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Mark B Mizrahi terminated (bp)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court hereby orders that the request of: NETAIRUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff to substitute Kyri Tsircou, as attorney of record instead of Mark Mizrahi,granting 87 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Mark Daniel Roth terminated (bp)
January 12, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court hereby orders that the request of: NETAIRUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff to substitute Kyri Tsircou, retained counsel as attorney of record instead of Raymond P. Niro,granting 86 Request to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Raymond P Niro, Sr terminated (bp)
January 11, 2016 Filing 89 First STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response as to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Invalidity of All Asserted Claims 83 filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Stipulation)(Tsircou, Kyriacos)
January 11, 2016 Filing 88 First REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Kyri Tsircou in place of attorney Mark Mizrahi filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Mizrahi Proposed Order) (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
January 11, 2016 Filing 87 First REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Kyri Tsircou in place of attorney Mark D. Roth filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Roth Proposed Order) (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
January 11, 2016 Filing 86 First REQUEST TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY Kyri Tsircou in place of attorney Raymond P. Niro filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company). (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Niro Proposed Order) (Attorney Kyriacos S Tsircou added to party NetAirus Technologies LLC(pty:cd), Attorney Kyriacos S Tsircou added to party NetAirus Technologies LLC(pty:pla), Attorney Kyriacos S Tsircou added to party NetAirus Technologies LLC(pty:cd)) (Tsircou, Kyriacos)
November 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE JS-5 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Scheduling Conference set for 2/1/2016 at 08:30 AM. Report due by 1/22/2016. ORDER REOPENING CASE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Made JS-5, Case reopened) (bp)
November 13, 2015 Filing 84 JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Mizrahi, Mark) Modified on 11/13/2015 (ake).
November 9, 2015 Filing 83 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Invalidity of All Asserted Claims filed by Defendant Apple Inc. Motion set for hearing on 2/1/2016 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Scarsi, Mark)
November 9, 2015 Filing 82 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro of Niro, Haller & Niro; Mark B. Mizrahi of Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP; and Mark D. Roth of Orum & Roth, LLC to Withdraw as Attorney 81 filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Scarsi Declaration, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)(Scarsi, Mark)
October 29, 2015 Filing 81 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro of Niro, Haller & Niro; Mark B. Mizrahi of Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP; and Mark D. Roth of Orum & Roth, LLC to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant NetAirus Technologies LLC. Motion set for hearing on 2/1/2016 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Motion and Motion to Withdraw, # 2 Declaration of Mark D. Roth in Support of Motion to Withdraw, # 3 Proposed Order Granting Motion for NetAirus Technologies, LLC's Counsel to Withdraw) (Mizrahi, Mark)
October 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro of Niro, Haller & Niro; Mark B. Mizrahi of Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP; and Mark D. Roth of Orum & Roth, LLC to Withdraw as Attorney 79 , for the following reasons: The motion is set for a day that the Court's calendar is full and, therefore, closed. The motion is stricken. Counsel shall refer to the Court's procedures and schedules found on the USDC Website to obtain open motion dates and re-file the motion. (pso)
October 28, 2015 Filing 79 **STRICKEN** REFER TO DKT. 80 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro of Niro, Haller & Niro; Mark B. Mizrahi of Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, LLP; and Mark D. Roth of Orum & Roth, LLC to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant NetAirus Technologies LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/30/2015 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Motion and Motion to Withdraw, # 2 Declaration of Mark D. Roth in Support of Motion to Withdraw, # 3 Supplement Granting Motion for NetAirus Technologies, LLC's Counsel to Withdraw) (Mizrahi, Mark) Modified on 10/29/2015 (pso).
October 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro, Sr., Mark Mizrahi, and Mark Roth to Withdraw as Attorney 77 , for the following reasons: The motion is set for a day that the Court's calendar is full and, therefore, closed. The motion is stricken. Counsel shall refer to Judge Kronstadt's procedures and schedules found on the Court's Website to obtain open motion dates and re-file the motion.; (bp)
October 23, 2015 Filing 77 [STRICKEN PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED 10/26] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION of Raymond P. Niro, Sr., Mark Mizrahi, and Mark Roth to Withdraw as Attorney filed by plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/23/2015 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Motion and Motion to Withdraw, # 2 Declaration Declaration of Mark D. Roth In Support of Motion to Withdraw, # 3 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for NetAirus Technologies, LLC's Counsel to Withdraw) (Mizrahi, Mark) Modified on 10/26/2015 (bp).
September 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 74 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before November 13, 2015 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including November 13, 2015, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc5, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 75 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE NOTICE OF AMENDED CONSOLIDATED STANDING ORDERS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Counsel are advised that on September 11, 2015, the Court amended its Standing Orders. Counsel shall obtain a copy of the Orders by referring to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court (www.cacd.uscourts.gov). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pso) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 11, 2015 Filing 74 STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Scarsi, Mark)
July 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 73 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 72 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before September 12, 2015 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including September 12, 2015, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc4, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
July 14, 2015 Filing 72 STATUS REPORT of Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC and Defendant Apple Inc. filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Scarsi, Mark)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 71 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 70 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before July 14, 2015 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including July 14, 2015, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc4, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 15, 2015 Filing 70 STATUS REPORT of Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC and Defendant Apple Inc. filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Mizrahi, Mark)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 68 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before May 15, 2015 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including May 15, 2015, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. IT IS SO ORDERED.THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc4, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 13, 2015 Filing 68 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Niro, Raymond)
February 17, 2015 Filing 67 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Raymond P Niro, Sr counsel for Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. Joseph A. Culig is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC. (Niro, Raymond)
January 26, 2015 Filing 66 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph A Culig counsel for Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. Robert A. Conley is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies, LLC. (Culig, Joseph)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 64 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before March 16, 2015 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including March 16, 2015, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc4, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 15, 2015 Filing 64 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Culig, Joseph)
December 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 63 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 62 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before January 15, 2015 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including January 15, 2015, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.
December 1, 2014 Filing 62 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Lin, Ashlee)
November 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 61 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 60 ) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before December 1, 2014 regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including December 1, 2014, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc4, ) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 22, 2014 Filing 60 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Lin, Ashlee)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 59 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 57) and orders counsel to file an updated joint report on or before October 24, 2014, or within 10 days after the completion of the briefing before the Federal Circuit, regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including October 24, 2014, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. 57 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 8, 2014 Filing 58 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Chris L Holm counsel for Defendant Apple Inc. Chris L. Holm is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Holm, Chris)
July 21, 2014 Filing 57 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Culig, Joseph)
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 56 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE NOTICE OF AMENDED STANDING ORDER(S) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Counsel are advised that the Court has amended one or more of its Standing Orders. Counsel shall refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the Order(s). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Report (Dkt. 54) and orders that a further joint report be filed no later than July 21, 2014, regarding the status of the appeal and any post trial motions. The stay will remain up through and including July 21, 2014, or until further order from this Court. The Court will determine whether a Status Conference is necessary upon review of the joint report. 54 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
May 6, 2014 Filing 54 STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Culig, Joseph)
May 6, 2014 Filing 53 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Hannah Lynn Cannom counsel for Defendant Apple Inc. Hannah Lynn Cannom is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Cannom, Hannah)
March 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 52 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court hereby modifies the Courts Order of January 24, 2014 45 as follows: Counsel are ordered to file a joint status report every 60 days, with the first one due on May 9, 2014, regarding the status of the post-trial motions in the Related Case, or within 5 days of a decision being rendered, or within 7 days after an appeal, if one is taken in NetAirus 1 and/or when the matter should be reinstated to the Courts active calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
March 10, 2014 Filing 51 STATUS REPORT First Joint Status Report filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Scarsi, Mark)
February 14, 2014 Filing 50 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Order on Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice 49 . The following error(s) was found: Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lt)
February 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting 47 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Christopher J. Gaspar on behalf of Defendant Apple, Inc., designating Mark C. Scarsi as local counsel. (lt)
February 12, 2014 Filing 48 OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Apple Inc(a California corporation), re APPLICATION for attorney Christopher J. Gaspar to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (PHV FEE PAID.) 47 served on 02/12/14. (lt)
February 12, 2014 Filing 47 APPLICATION for attorney Christopher J. Gaspar to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (PHV FEE PAID.) filed by Defendant Apple Inc(a California corporation). Lodged Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Attorney Christopher J Gaspar added to party Apple Inc(pty:cc), Attorney Christopher J Gaspar added to party Apple Inc(pty:cc), Attorney Christopher J Gaspar added to party Apple Inc(pty:dft))(lt)
January 31, 2014 Filing 46 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph A Culig counsel for Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. Tahiti Arsulowicz is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Joe Culig. (Culig, Joseph)
January 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 45 MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER PLACING CASE ON COURTS INACTIVE CALENDAR JS-6: Stayed/Inactive Calendar by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, places this matter on its inactive calendar pending a decision by this Court on the anticipated post-trial motions in Case No. LA CV10-03257 JAK (Ex) (the Related Case). Counsel are ordered to file a joint status report every 45 days, with the first one due on March 10, 2014, regarding the status of the post-trial motions in the Related Case, or within 5 days of a decision being rendered and/or when the matter should be reinstated to the Courts active calendar. In light of the foregoing, the Status and Scheduling Conference, set for January 27, 2014 is taken off calendar., Case stayed. (shb)
January 13, 2014 Filing 44 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Ashlee N Lin on behalf of Counter Claimants Apple Inc, Apple Inc, Defendant Apple Inc (Attorney Ashlee N Lin added to party Apple Inc(pty:cc), Attorney Ashlee N Lin added to party Apple Inc(pty:cc), Attorney Ashlee N Lin added to party Apple Inc(pty:dft))(Lin, Ashlee)
January 13, 2014 Filing 43 STATUS REPORT Parties' Joint Status Report filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (Scarsi, Mark)
December 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Court has reviewed the Parties' Joint Status Report (Dkt. 41) (the "Report") and sets a Status and Scheduling Conference for January 27, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Counsel shall file a further Joint Report by January 13, 2014, which shall include a proposed schedule for addressing by motion, the issues raised in the Report by Defendant. The Court will determine whether the January 27, 2014 Status Conference is necessary upon review of the report. 41 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 20, 2013 Filing 41 STATUS REPORT Parties' Joint Status Report filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Culig, Joseph)
December 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING DATE FOR JOINT REPORT RE STATUS by Judge John A Kronstadt: In light of the trial held in the related case LA CV10-03257 JAK (Ex), counsel shall file a joint report by December 20, 2013, which shall set forth the parties' collective or respective positions as to the status of this matter and whether the Scheduling Conference should be placed back on calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
November 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting 38 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Joseph A. Culig on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Mark B. Mizrahi as local counsel. (lt)
November 20, 2013 Filing 38 APPLICATION for attorney Joseph A. Culig to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE PAID.) filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order PHV Fee Receipt 0973-13010192)(Mizrahi, Mark) Modified on 11/20/2013 (lt).
November 8, 2013 Filing 37 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Parties Joint Rule 16(B) Report ; estimated length of trial 6 days, filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC.. (Arsulowicz, Tahiti)
October 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A Kronstadt: The Scheduling Conference is set for November 18, 2013 at 1:30 pm, with the Joint Report, which shall include the completed Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates, to be filed no later than November 8, 2013. (ake)
September 27, 2013 Filing 35 NetAirus Technologies, LLC's ANSWER to Apple, Inc.'s First Amended Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company).(Arsulowicz, Tahiti)
September 10, 2013 Filing 34 APPLE'S AMENDED ANSWER, DEFENSES to Answer to Complaint (Discovery) AND COUNTERCLAIMS, 30 filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (shb) (shb).
August 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt, GRANTING Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Answer and/or Move to Dismiss and/or Strike Apple's Counterclaim 32 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The deadline for NetAirus to answer and/or move to dismiss and/or strike Apples counterclaim and Affirmative Defenses, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, shall be extended to September 10, 2013; and 2. By no later than September 4, 2013, Apple will inform NetAirus either that it will file and serve an amended answer and counterclaim or that it does not intend to do so. (shb)
August 27, 2013 Filing 32 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Apple Inc.'s Counterclaim filed by plaintiff and counter-defendant NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mizrahi, Mark)
August 14, 2013 Filing 31 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Apple Inc, upon Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company) served on 8/8/2013, answer due 8/29/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Richard J. Ditzik in compliance with statute not specified by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Scarsi, Mark)
August 5, 2013 21 DAY Summons Issued re Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim,, 30 as to Counter Defendant NetAirus Technologies LLC(a California Limited Liability Company). (shb)
August 2, 2013 Filing 30 APPLE'S ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, 18 and COUNTERCLAIM against Counter Defendant NetAirus Technologies LLC; Jury Demand filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Apple Inc.(shb) (shb). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/7/2013: # 1 Summons issued) (shb).
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting 25 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Tahiti Arsulowicz on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Mark B. Mizrahi as local counsel. (lt)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting 24 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Raymond P. Niro on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Mark B. Mizrahi as local counsel. (lt) (Main Document 28 replaced on 7/29/2013) (lt).
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting 23 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Robert A. Conley on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Mark B. Mizrahi as local counsel. (lt)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PILOT PROGRAM FOR UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: This Court is participating in a pilot program regarding the submission of sealed documents. Effective July 8, 2013, all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via email to the Judge's Chambers' email at: jak_chambers@cacd.uscourts.gov consistent with this Order. (dv)
July 26, 2013 Filing 25 APPLICATION for attorney Arsulowicz, Tahiti to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12461662 paid.) filed by plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mizrahi, Mark)
July 26, 2013 Filing 24 APPLICATION for attorney Niro, Raymond P. to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12461546 paid.) filed by plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mizrahi, Mark)
July 26, 2013 Filing 23 APPLICATION for attorney Conley, Robert A. to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12461410 paid.) filed by plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mizrahi, Mark)
July 24, 2013 Filing 22 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC, upon Defendant Apple Inc served on 7/19/2013, answer due 8/9/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Margaret Wilson, Process Specialist, CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND (Mizrahi, Mark)
July 19, 2013 Filing 21 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Apple Inc, (shb)
July 19, 2013 Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), 1 with JURY DEMAND and COUNTERCLAIM against NetAirus Technologies LLC, Jury Demand filed by Defendant Apple Inc.(shb) (shb).
July 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS by Judge John A. Kronstadt: the following document(s) be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Local Rules, General Order and/or the Courts Case Management Order: Amended Document (Non-Motion) 17 , for the following reasons: A first amended complaint is an initiating document. All initiating documents are to be manually filed. See L.R. 5-4.2. (rne)
July 16, 2013 Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Apple Inc amending Complaint - (Discovery), 1 ; Jury Demand,filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC (shb)
July 15, 2013 Filing 17 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. First Amended Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Roth, Mark)
June 19, 2013 Filing 16 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Apple Inc answer now due 7/19/2013, re Complaint - (Discovery), 1 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.(Scarsi, Mark)
June 19, 2013 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Chris L Holm on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc (Holm, Chris)
June 19, 2013 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Hannah Lynn Cannom on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc (Cannom, Hannah)
June 19, 2013 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Mark C Scarsi on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc (Scarsi, Mark)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt: granting 8 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Mark D. Roth on behalf of Plaintiff, designating Mark Mizrahi as local counsel. (lt)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A Kronstadt: Please read this Order carefully. It governs this case and differs in some respect from the Local Rules. The Initial Standing Order can also be found on the Court's Website under Judge Kronstadt's Procedures and Schedules, which is always the most recent and updated version. (ake)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: This action has been reassigned to the Honorable John A. Kronstadt, United States District Judge. The case number will now read: LA CV13-3780 JAK (Ex). Because all pleadings are routed using the judges initials, please be sure to use the initials JAK in place of the initials RGK on all future filings. Judge Kronstadts Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Andrea Keifer, can be reached at 213.894.2156 or at andrea_keifer@cacd.uscourts.gov. 9 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(ake) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 10-03257 JAK(Ex). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi and Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 10-03257 JAK(Ex). Signed by Judge R. Gary Klausner (rn)
June 4, 2013 Filing 8 APPLICATION for to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $325 receipt number 0973-12209586 paid.) filed by plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Re Pro Hac Vice Application)(Mizrahi, Mark)
June 3, 2013 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC, upon Plaintiff Apple Inc served on 5/29/2013, answer due 6/19/2013. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Maria Sanchez, Process Specialist, Ct Corporation, Registered Agent for Apple Inc. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons returned. (Mizrahi, Mark)
May 29, 2013 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to Mark Roth for Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. Your Pro Hac Vice application has not been received by the court. Please return your completed Application of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case, form G-64, or a copy of the Notice of Electronic Filing of your application and the $325.00 fee and this notice immediately. Out-of-state federal government attorneys who are not employed by the U.S. Department of Justice are required to file a Pro Hac Vice application; no filing fee is required. (et)
May 28, 2013 Filing 6 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. Related Case(s): 2:10-cv-03257 JAK (Ex) (mg)
May 28, 2013 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by NetAirus Technologies LLC. (et)
May 28, 2013 Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (et) (mg).
May 28, 2013 Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendant Apple Inc. (et)
May 28, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Apple Inc. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi.(Filing fee $ 400 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff NetAirus Technologies LLC. (et) (mg). (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/30/2013: # 1 Summons) (mg).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NetAirus Technologies LLC v. Apple Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc
Represented By: Hannah Lynn Cannom
Represented By: Chris L Holm
Represented By: Mark C Scarsi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NetAirus Technologies LLC
Represented By: Mark B Mizrahi
Represented By: Mark Daniel Roth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?