Armando Beristain-Vargas v. Tight Quarters, Inc. et al
| Armando Beristain-Vargas |
| Telford T. Cottam, Doe One through and including Doe One Hundred and Tight Quarters, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv05600 |
| August 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| S. James Otero |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER AND JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge S. James Otero: The Court 21 hereby approves the payment of an incentive award to the Plaintiff, in the amount of 22 $5,000.00.The Court approves the payment of attor neys fees to Class Counsel in the the sum of $60,000.00, to be apportioned as: $30,000.00 to Law Office of Jonathan Ricasa and $30,000.00 to Briana Kim, PC.The Court approves the reimbursement of litigation expenses in the sum of & #036;5,908.40, apportioned s as follows: $1,054.29 to Law28 Office of Jonathan Ricasa and $4,854.11 to Briana Kim, PC.Court approves a payment of $1,000.00 to Californias Labor & 2 Workforce Development Agency.. The Court approves and orders payment in the amount of $8,750.00 toPhoenix Settlement Administrators for performance of its settlement administration services. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR OTHER SPECIFICS). Related to: Order on Motion for Settlement 61 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . WHEREAS, on February 17, 2014, Plaintiff Armando Beristain-Vargas and Defendants Tight Quarters, Inc. and Telford T. Cottam filed a joint Stipulated Protective Order, Document #36 (Protective Order), in the above entitled action. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Protective Order, in its entirety, is hereby ordered into full force and effect. 37 (bem)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
