John Omavel Luciano et al v. Chase Bank et al
John Omavel Luciano and Jose Jaime Montero |
Chase Bank, California Reconveyance Company and Brenda Batten |
2:2013cv07896 |
October 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gary A. Feess |
Ralph Zarefsky |
Negotiable Instrument |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Gary A. Feess: This Court must have federal question or diversity jurisdiction in order to hear Plaintiff's case, and Plaintiff does not allege facts sufficient to support either. The Court has already given him m ultiple opportunities to address this issue, but his responses have not even remotely answered the Court's concerns. Because the Court is convinced of the futility of granting Plaintiff additional opportunities to respond, this action is hereby DISMISSED for lack ofsubject matter jurisdiction. See document for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo) |
Filing 13 ORDERT TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess. This Court must have federal question or diversity jurisdiction in order to hear Plaintiff's case, and Plaintiff has not alleged facts sufficient to support either. It is therefore unclear why the Cou rt should have jurisdiction. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than Thursday, January 9, 2014, as to why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to dismissal of this action. See document for details. (smo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.