Marian Turner et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company et al
| Cornelius Turner, Lisa Turner and Marian Turner |
| Thornhill and Associates, Inc., The Rule Company, Incorporated, Nadja Silletto, Craig Ponci, Norma Pierson, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company, Tony Gaitan, Does and Elaine Albrecht |
| Cornelius Turner, Lisa Turner and Marian Turner |
| Hartford Casualty Insurance Company |
| 2:2013cv08361 |
| November 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
IN CHAMBERS COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. The Notice of Removal filed by plaintiffs Marian Turner, Lisa Turner, and Cornelius Turner (collectively "Plaintiffs") on November 12, 2013, appears to suffer from numerous procedural defec ts. In light of these potential procedural defects, the parties are ordered to show cause in writing why this action should not be remanded. Defendants' response to this order to show cause shall be filed no later than December 20, 2013. The fa ilure by defendants to file a response by that date shall be deemed a waiver of any procedural defects. Should defendants respond to the order to show cause and assert that the Notice of Removal is procedurally defective, Plaintiffs response to this order to show cause shall be filed no later than January 3, 2013. After that date, the matter will be deemed submitted and the Court will notify the parties once it has reached a decision. Nothing in this order to show cause shall be considered to limit the Courts authority to address the serious issues related to Plaintiffs invocation of 28 U.S.C. § 1443 as a basis for the Court's subject matter jurisdiction. The Court may, at any time before final judgment, remand an action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
