In Re Namco Capital Group Inc
| Bradley D. Sharp |
| Enayat Nahai |
| Namco Capital Group Inc |
| 2:2013cv09430 |
| December 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING PURSUANT TO SETTLEMENT 19 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell that the within Adversary Proceeding is dismissed with prejudice, all parties to bear their own fees and costs. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms and provisions of the settlement. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRETRIAL DOCUMENTS by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. The parties are currently scheduled to appear for a pretrial conference on Monday,April 27, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 12 at 2.) In anticipation of this hearing, the p arties were required to lodge a pretrial conference order by no later than April 13, 2015. (Dkt. No. 12 at 2.) To date, however, neither party has filed such an order. Accordingly, the parties are hereby ORDERED to lodge with the Court by no later than Thursday, April 23, 2015, at 4:00 p.m. either a pretrial conference order or a voluntary dismissal of this action. Failure by either party to comply with this order may result in sanctions. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
