Cold Heaven Cellars LLC et al v. Scott Manlin et al
Plaintiff: Cold Heaven Cellars LLC and Phyllis Morgan Clendenen
Defendant: Does, Bonvivino Capital LLC and Scott Manlin
Case Number: 2:2014cv01050
Filed: February 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F. Mumm
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER CONTINUING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION 11 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:In light of Plaintiffs response, the Court CONTINUES the Order to Show Cause to Monday, April 14, 2014, and CONTINUES Defendants response dateuntil Friday, April 11, 2014. No hearing will be held; the parties shall respond in writing. The parties need not file a stipulation extending Defendants response date unless they wish to further extend the deadline. (lc)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than March 31, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consi der the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: -Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendants. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will ta ke precedence. -Answer by the defendant(s). In accordance with Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, no oral argument on this Order to Show Cause will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (jre)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cold Heaven Cellars LLC et al v. Scott Manlin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bonvivino Capital LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Manlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cold Heaven Cellars LLC
Represented By: R Christopher Harshman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phyllis Morgan Clendenen
Represented By: R Christopher Harshman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?