Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Dreams Footwear, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Defendant: Dreams Footwear, Inc., Does and Frank Chen
Case Number: 2:2014cv02649
Filed: April 8, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER RE CONSENT JUDGMENT INCLUDING PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND VOLUNTARYDISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE as to defendants Dreams Footwear, Inc., Frank Chen Plaintiff and Defendants. Parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees by Judge Otis D. Wright, II ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lc)
July 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER SETTING UNIFIED SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On July 3, 2014, the Court consolidated the Deckers Cases, finding that they are related within the meaning of General Order 08-05, section 5, and Local Rule 83-1.3. (ECF No. 29 .) In order to efficiently manage these related cases, the Court SETS a unified scheduling conference in all actions for Monday, September 22, 2014 at 1:30 pm the same date currently set for a scheduling conference in 2:14-cv-02577. The Court accordi ngly CONTINUES the scheduling conferences already set in 2:14-cv- 02561 and 2:14-cv-02649 to that date. The Court understands that Defendant J.C. Penney Company Inc. has not yet answered the recently filed First Amended Complaint in 2:14-cv-02565. J. C. Penney Company is therefore not required to attend the scheduling conference or participate in Rule 26(f) discussions unless it answers the First Amended Complaint before the unified scheduling conference. In anticipation of the unified scheduling conference, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff and all parties who have answered in the Deckers Cases to participate in joint Rule 26(f) discussions, preferably in person. The parties shall submit a Rule 26(f)report just like any other scheduling conference and file it in the master case file. The parties shall file the joint report no later than seven days before the scheduling conference .(lc). Modified on 7/9/2014. (lc).
July 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: List of Deckers Cases:2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx); 2:14-cv-02565-ODW(MANx); 2:14-cv-02577-ODW(CWx); 2:14-cv-02649-ODW(PLAx). The low-number case, Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Sears Holdings Corp. et al., No. 2:14-cv-02561-ODW(CWx) (C.D. Cal. case filed Apr. 4, 2014), will serve as the master case file.This Order does not constitute a determination that these actions should be consolidated for trial, nor does it have the effect of making any entity a party to an action in which it has not been joined and served in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All orders, pleadings, motions, and other documents will, when filed and docketed in the master case file, be deemed filed and dock eted in each individual related case to the extent applicable. Parties shall enter their appearances in the individual cases, and the Clerk is directed to add all parties and attorneys from the individual cases to the master case file such that all c ounsel appearing in the individual cases will receive notifications for the master case file as well. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS ) The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to immediately serve a copy of this order on all Defendants who have not yet filed appearances in the cases (and who therefore have not received a copy through the CM/ECF system). (lc) .Modified on 7/7/2014 (lc).
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing by Tuesday, June 24, 2014, why it has not moved for entry of default against Dreams Footwear. No hearing will be held; Plaintiff shall respond in writing. The Court will discharge this Order upon a timely application for entry of default filed with the Clerk of Court. Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal for lack of prosecution. (lc)
May 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/27/2014. (ah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Dreams Footwear, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dreams Footwear, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Frank Chen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deckers Outdoor Corporation
Represented By: Cindy W Chan
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?