Alex Demetrius Graves v. Scott Frauhenheim
Petitioner: Alex Demetrius Graves
Respondent: Scott Frauhenheim
Case Number: 2:2014cv02761
Filed: April 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge: Michael R. Wilner
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 21 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alex Demetrius Graves v. Scott Frauhenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Frauhenheim
Represented By: Julie Ann Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alex Demetrius Graves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?