Ronald W. Grigg v. Gregory O'Brien et al
Ronald W Grigg |
ADR Services Inc, Gregory O'Brien and Whittier College |
2:2014cv02853 |
April 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Ralph Zarefsky |
P.I.: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 203 JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (MD JS-6; Case Terminated) (vdr) |
Filing 146 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SANCTIONS by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. A Show Cause Hearing is set for 2/12/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (vdr) |
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER - it is hereby Ordered that the motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer (ECF No. 18 ) filed by Defendant Whittier College is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted to the extent this case is transferred to the Central District of California. The motion is otherwise denied. It is further Ordered that the motion to dismiss (ECF No. 16 ) filed by Defendants Gregory O'Brien and ADR Services, Inc., is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. This case shall be marked as closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion & Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 4/11/2014. (dlg) [Transferred from Pennsylvania Western on 4/14/2014.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.