Raul Leos v. Federal Express Corporation
| Raul Leos |
| Federal Express Corporation and Does |
| 2:2014cv02864 |
| April 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: In light of the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 39), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than Monday, December 15, 2014, why a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement has not been filed. This Order will be discharged when the motion is filed. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. (lc)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. CLASS CERTIFICATION AND SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: A motion for class certification has not been filed. The Court was informed a few weeks ago that a settlement has been reached, but a Notice of Settlement was not filed nor has a request for an extension of time to move for class certification.1 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than Monday, November 17, 2014, why the parties have not moved for preliminary approval of a class settlement. No hearing will be held. This Order will be discharged upon the filing of an appropriate response, which may include a motion seeking preliminary approval of the settlement. (lc)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND 19 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court finds that FedEx has established by a preponderance of the evidence that the amount in controversy exceeds $5 million. The Court therefore has CAFA class-action jurisdict ion over Leos's action and thus DENIES his Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 19.) Further, because the Court finds that FedEx has met its evidentiary burden, it declines to stay the proceedings pending the outcome of Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens, 134 S. Ct. 1788 (2014). (lc). Modified on 6/10/2014 .(lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
