California Communities Against Toxics v. Armorcast Products Company, Inc.
| California Communities Against Toxics |
| Armorcast Products Company, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv05728 |
| July 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Environmental Matters |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Percy Anderson, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 112 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Communities Against Toxics claims against Defendants Armorcast Products Company, Inc. and AriAleong, as set forth in the Second Amended Complaint filed in Case No. 2:14-cv-5728-PA-FFM, are hereby dismissed with prejudice Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (pj)
|
|
Filing
83
PROTECTIVE ORDER RE FINANCIAL DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY DEFENDANT ARMORCAST PRODUCTSCOMPANY, INC. by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. *See Order.* (es)
|
|
Filing
57
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson: Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by defendants Armorcast Products Company, Inc. and Ari Aleong (Docket No. 40). Defendants challenge the sufficiency of the Se cond Amended Complaint filed by plaintiff California Communities Against Toxics. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing calendared for February 9, 2015, is vacated, and the matter taken off calendar. Court denies Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Defendants shall file their Answer to the SAC no later than February 23, 2015. In its November 12, 2014 minute o rder granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the FAC, the Court stated that it would issue a Scheduling Order if and when Plaintiff alleged a viable claim that it had standing to pursue. Because the Court has denied Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the SAC, the Court will issue a separate Scheduling Order. See document for details. (smo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
